On Fri, 5 Aug 2005 11:39 am, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Aug 2005 10:53 am, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > All else being equal, it is much better if you unlock in the
> > same function that takes the lock. For readability.
> >
> > It looks like you should be able to leave all the flow control
> > and locking the same, and use update_monotonic_base() to
> > do the actual update?
>
> Good advice, thanks. Will respin.

Like this I assume you meant?

Cheers,
Con
---