mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rc5 seemed to kill a disk that rc4-mm1 likes.  Also some X trouble.
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 15:05:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050805150506.703e804f.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050805104025.GA14688@aitel.hist.no>

Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no> wrote:
>
> 2.6.13-rc5 seemed to kill a scsi disk (sdb) for me, where 2.6.13-rc4-mm1
> have no problems with the same disk.
> 
> Machine: opteron running a x86-64 kernel, with built-in SATA as well as
> a symbios scsi controller.  Two videocards running independent xservers.
> The sdb disk is on the symbios controller.
> 
> 
> Using 2.6.13-rc5 I suddenly got this in my logs:
> 
> Aug  3 22:06:00 tenkende-august -- MARK --
> Aug  3 22:17:15 tenkende-august kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: ABORT operation started.
> Aug  3 22:17:15 tenkende-august kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: ABORT operation timed-out.
> 
> ...
> This "no additiomnal sense" then repeats for many screenfulls.
> Two sdb partitions got dropped from RAID-1 as they failed, the
> md devices got remoutned read-only.
> 
> I thought the disk had died - it was my oldest so it'd be reasonable.
> Rebooting 2.6.13-rc5 did not bring the disk back - it came up useless again.
> 
> I switched back to 2.6.13-rc4-mm1 at this point for another reason,
> my X display aquired a nasty tendency to go blank for no reason during work,
> something I could fix by changing resolution baqck and forth.  X also tended to get
> stuck for a minute now and then - a problem I haven't seen since early 2.6.
> 
> These troubles disappeared by going back to 2.6.13-rc4-mm1.  Even more interesting,
> the sdb disk seems fine again.  There were no errors as I copied
> all data to another disk, and no errors when I ran a badblocks write-test
> (the nondestructive write test) on it. 
> 
> The two kernels have some config differences.  The 2.6.13-rc5 kernel
> has ACPI+CPUFREQ configured, that the 2.6.13-rc4-mm1 doesn't have.

That's a pretty big difference ;)

> ...
> I can run more tests, but don't know what would be the most interesting.
> rc5 without powermanagement?  rc4-mm1 with it? Or the newest git kernel?
> Or is this the effect of some known problem?

The latest -git kernel (or 2.6.13-rc6 if it's there) with APCI enabled is
the one to test, please.


  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-05 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-02  5:07 Linux 2.6.13-rc5 Linus Torvalds
2005-08-02  6:17 ` Jan De Luyck
2005-08-02  6:43 ` Linux 2.6.13-rc5 - possible acpi regression? Jan De Luyck
2005-08-02 10:50   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-08-03 10:59     ` Jan De Luyck
2005-08-02  7:56 ` Linux 2.6.13-rc5 Olaf Hering
2005-08-05 10:40 ` rc5 seemed to kill a disk that rc4-mm1 likes. Also some X trouble Helge Hafting
2005-08-05 22:05   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-08-07  9:41     ` Helge Hafting
2005-08-07 17:06     ` Danny ter Haar
2005-08-08 11:27       ` Helge Hafting
2005-08-08 12:14         ` Danny ter Haar
2005-08-08 14:59           ` Danny ter Haar
     [not found]   ` <21d7e99705080503515e3045d5@mail.gmail.com>
2005-08-09 12:20     ` Helge Hafting
2005-08-12 10:01       ` rc6 keeps hanging and blanking displays where rc4-mm1 works fine Helge Hafting
2005-08-12 10:32         ` Alan Cox
2005-08-15 12:53           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-08-15 13:00             ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-08-12 16:51         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-15 12:37           ` Helge Hafting
2005-08-15 15:50             ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-15 17:00               ` Ryan Anderson
2005-08-15 17:45               ` Helge Hafting
2005-08-15 21:48                 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2005-08-15 22:11               ` rc6 keeps hanging and blanking displays - bisection complete Helge Hafting
2005-08-15 22:59                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-16  8:46                   ` Helge Hafting
2005-08-16 19:29                   ` Helge Hafting
2005-08-15 23:18                 ` Dave Airlie
2005-08-15 23:24                   ` Dave Airlie
2005-08-16  7:34                     ` Helge Hafting
2005-08-16 16:52                     ` rc6 keeps hanging and blanking displays Helge Hafting
2005-08-16 17:00                       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-16 21:14                         ` Helge Hafting
2005-08-16 23:50                           ` Dave Airlie
2005-08-17 11:05                             ` Helge Hafting
2005-08-17 11:05                               ` Dave Airlie
2005-08-17 15:19                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-22 21:44                                   ` Helge Hafting
2005-08-22 23:07                                     ` Dave Airlie
2005-08-22 23:40                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-23 15:33                                         ` Alan Cox
2005-08-24  6:04                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-24  8:37                                           ` Helge Hafting
2005-09-08 23:47               ` rc6 keeps hanging and blanking displays where rc4-mm1 works fine Andrew Morton
2005-09-09  0:16                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-17 11:26       ` rc5 seemed to kill a disk that rc4-mm1 likes. Also some X trouble Rolf Eike Beer
2005-08-22  8:01         ` Rolf Eike Beer
2005-08-22 17:44           ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-22 17:45             ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-22 21:01             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-08-23  6:48             ` Rolf Eike Beer
2005-08-30  8:07             ` Rolf Eike Beer
2005-09-05  7:49               ` Rolf Eike Beer
2005-09-05  8:45                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-05 19:58                   ` Sonny Rao
2005-09-06  7:44                     ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050805150506.703e804f.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=helgehaf@aitel.hist.no \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®