From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rc5 seemed to kill a disk that rc4-mm1 likes. Also some X trouble.
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 15:05:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050805150506.703e804f.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050805104025.GA14688@aitel.hist.no>
Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no> wrote:
>
> 2.6.13-rc5 seemed to kill a scsi disk (sdb) for me, where 2.6.13-rc4-mm1
> have no problems with the same disk.
>
> Machine: opteron running a x86-64 kernel, with built-in SATA as well as
> a symbios scsi controller. Two videocards running independent xservers.
> The sdb disk is on the symbios controller.
>
>
> Using 2.6.13-rc5 I suddenly got this in my logs:
>
> Aug 3 22:06:00 tenkende-august -- MARK --
> Aug 3 22:17:15 tenkende-august kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: ABORT operation started.
> Aug 3 22:17:15 tenkende-august kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: ABORT operation timed-out.
>
> ...
> This "no additiomnal sense" then repeats for many screenfulls.
> Two sdb partitions got dropped from RAID-1 as they failed, the
> md devices got remoutned read-only.
>
> I thought the disk had died - it was my oldest so it'd be reasonable.
> Rebooting 2.6.13-rc5 did not bring the disk back - it came up useless again.
>
> I switched back to 2.6.13-rc4-mm1 at this point for another reason,
> my X display aquired a nasty tendency to go blank for no reason during work,
> something I could fix by changing resolution baqck and forth. X also tended to get
> stuck for a minute now and then - a problem I haven't seen since early 2.6.
>
> These troubles disappeared by going back to 2.6.13-rc4-mm1. Even more interesting,
> the sdb disk seems fine again. There were no errors as I copied
> all data to another disk, and no errors when I ran a badblocks write-test
> (the nondestructive write test) on it.
>
> The two kernels have some config differences. The 2.6.13-rc5 kernel
> has ACPI+CPUFREQ configured, that the 2.6.13-rc4-mm1 doesn't have.
That's a pretty big difference ;)
> ...
> I can run more tests, but don't know what would be the most interesting.
> rc5 without powermanagement? rc4-mm1 with it? Or the newest git kernel?
> Or is this the effect of some known problem?
The latest -git kernel (or 2.6.13-rc6 if it's there) with APCI enabled is
the one to test, please.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-05 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-02 5:07 Linux 2.6.13-rc5 Linus Torvalds
2005-08-02 6:17 ` Jan De Luyck
2005-08-02 6:43 ` Linux 2.6.13-rc5 - possible acpi regression? Jan De Luyck
2005-08-02 10:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-08-03 10:59 ` Jan De Luyck
2005-08-02 7:56 ` Linux 2.6.13-rc5 Olaf Hering
2005-08-05 10:40 ` rc5 seemed to kill a disk that rc4-mm1 likes. Also some X trouble Helge Hafting
2005-08-05 22:05 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-08-07 9:41 ` Helge Hafting
2005-08-07 17:06 ` Danny ter Haar
2005-08-08 11:27 ` Helge Hafting
2005-08-08 12:14 ` Danny ter Haar
2005-08-08 14:59 ` Danny ter Haar
[not found] ` <21d7e99705080503515e3045d5@mail.gmail.com>
2005-08-09 12:20 ` Helge Hafting
2005-08-12 10:01 ` rc6 keeps hanging and blanking displays where rc4-mm1 works fine Helge Hafting
2005-08-12 10:32 ` Alan Cox
2005-08-15 12:53 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-08-15 13:00 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-08-12 16:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-15 12:37 ` Helge Hafting
2005-08-15 15:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-15 17:00 ` Ryan Anderson
2005-08-15 17:45 ` Helge Hafting
2005-08-15 21:48 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2005-08-15 22:11 ` rc6 keeps hanging and blanking displays - bisection complete Helge Hafting
2005-08-15 22:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-16 8:46 ` Helge Hafting
2005-08-16 19:29 ` Helge Hafting
2005-08-15 23:18 ` Dave Airlie
2005-08-15 23:24 ` Dave Airlie
2005-08-16 7:34 ` Helge Hafting
2005-08-16 16:52 ` rc6 keeps hanging and blanking displays Helge Hafting
2005-08-16 17:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-16 21:14 ` Helge Hafting
2005-08-16 23:50 ` Dave Airlie
2005-08-17 11:05 ` Helge Hafting
2005-08-17 11:05 ` Dave Airlie
2005-08-17 15:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-22 21:44 ` Helge Hafting
2005-08-22 23:07 ` Dave Airlie
2005-08-22 23:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-23 15:33 ` Alan Cox
2005-08-24 6:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-24 8:37 ` Helge Hafting
2005-09-08 23:47 ` rc6 keeps hanging and blanking displays where rc4-mm1 works fine Andrew Morton
2005-09-09 0:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-17 11:26 ` rc5 seemed to kill a disk that rc4-mm1 likes. Also some X trouble Rolf Eike Beer
2005-08-22 8:01 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2005-08-22 17:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-22 17:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-22 21:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-08-23 6:48 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2005-08-30 8:07 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2005-09-05 7:49 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2005-09-05 8:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-05 19:58 ` Sonny Rao
2005-09-06 7:44 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050805150506.703e804f.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=helgehaf@aitel.hist.no \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®