From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263079AbVHEQgV (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2005 12:36:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263065AbVHEQgP (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2005 12:36:15 -0400 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.130]:26506 "EHLO e32.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263054AbVHEQep (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2005 12:34:45 -0400 Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 12:27:20 -0500 From: serue@us.ibm.com To: James Morris Cc: serue@us.ibm.com, lkml , Chris Wright , Stephen Smalley , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] Stacker - single-use static slots Message-ID: <20050805172720.GA8870@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> References: <20050727181732.GA22483@serge.austin.ibm.com> <20050803164516.GB13691@serge.austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting James Morris (jmorris@redhat.com): > On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 serue@us.ibm.com wrote: > > > The attached patch implements your idea on top of my previous patchset. > > Following is performance data on a 16-way ppc. dbench and tbench were > > run 50 times, kernbench and reaim 10 times each; results are mean +/- > > 95% confidence half-interval. The 'static slot' kernel had a single > > static slot for selinux, plus the (unused in this case) shared struct > > hlist_head security. > > Can you also compare with no stacker at all (i.e. just SELinux with caps > as secondary module) ? Will do. I'll try to get a full set of numbers by next week, comparing: no stacker "original" stacker stacker with one shared slot stacker with two shared slots thanks, -serge