From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932549AbWEVHIp (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2006 03:08:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932539AbWEVHIo (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2006 03:08:44 -0400 Received: from dsl027-180-173.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.173]:34207 "EHLO picasso.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932543AbWEVHIo (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2006 03:08:44 -0400 Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 08:49:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20050806.084950.74730249.davem@davemloft.net> To: olh@suse.de Cc: bboissin@gmail.com, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] implicit declaration of function `page_cache_release' From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20050806150103.GA21821@suse.de> References: <40f323d00508051218c30d7af@mail.gmail.com> <20050806.065520.85401639.davem@davemloft.net> <20050806150103.GA21821@suse.de> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Olaf Hering Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 17:01:03 +0200 > So the patch should be reverted? Its only for CONFIG_SWAP=n, rather > unusual for KDE/GNOME tainted workstations... Not necessarily, but the header dependencies should be fixed up somehow.