From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262190AbVHFL64 (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Aug 2005 07:58:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262724AbVHFL64 (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Aug 2005 07:58:56 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:14767 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262190AbVHFL6v (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Aug 2005 07:58:51 -0400 Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 13:58:36 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Christoph Hellwig , Andi Kleen , Zachary Amsden , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 8/8 Create MMU 2/3 level accessors in the sub-arch layer (i386) Message-ID: <20050806115836.GN8266@wotan.suse.de> References: <42F46558.9010202@vmware.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <20050806115619.GA1560@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050806115619.GA1560@infradead.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > I think that patch is really ugly - it makes hacking VM on i386 > > even more painful than it already is because the convolutes the file > > structure even more. Hope it is not applied. > > Especially as there's been no user shown for it, similar to all the other > ugly patches from vmware. Well, some of it can be counted as cleanup or even tuning like the excellent switch_to patch. But not that one and some of the more intrusive patches. -Andi >