From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932184AbVHKBgM (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:36:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932200AbVHKBgM (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:36:12 -0400 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.197]:21562 "EHLO zproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932184AbVHKBgL (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:36:11 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:from; b=A33kJh/raFSqC7SW5eGny71umcilgviCv6Up9yINmOzvpKcbvhHs+J+DMZgcwGS7xBE9nCS+3X/9+dxd/pMQALFhTeVVjOwRBkAs2WVNFsx+34xtYIPYWpQDz5jDAATsjk103NzLL1mra4rFnWujwH2As9qIu/fCZLW4tp8jIXU= Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:36:04 -0400 To: Daniel Drake Cc: Kristoffer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: captive-ntfs FUSE support? Message-ID: <20050811013604.GA29515@nineveh.rivenstone.net> Mail-Followup-To: Daniel Drake , Kristoffer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <42FA364C.9090605@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42FA364C.9090605@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i From: jfannin@gmail.com (Joseph Fannin) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 06:15:56PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: > As for captive, I don't think its worth the effort. It has severe memory > problems and Linux-NTFS development is going quite fast anyway. I haven't seen any real changes in NTFS support in the kernel since the mid-2.5 series. Is there somewhere else I should be looking? Thanks! -- Joseph Fannin jfannin@gmail.com "Bull in pure form is rare; there is usually some contamination by data." -- William Graves Perry Jr.