From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751225AbVHLQmq (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:42:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751226AbVHLQmq (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:42:46 -0400 Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:61153 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751225AbVHLQmp (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:42:45 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 18:42:44 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: yhlu Cc: Andi Kleen , Martin Wilck , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: APIC version and 8-bit APIC IDs Message-ID: <20050812164244.GC22901@wotan.suse.de> References: <42FC8461.2040102@fujitsu-siemens.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <42FCA23C.7040601@fujitsu-siemens.com> <20050812133248.GN8974@wotan.suse.de> <42FCA97E.5010907@fujitsu-siemens.com> <42FCB86C.5040509@fujitsu-siemens.com> <20050812145725.GD922@wotan.suse.de> <86802c44050812093774bf4816@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86802c44050812093774bf4816@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 09:37:11AM -0700, yhlu wrote: > So MPTABLE do not have problem with it, only acpi related...? It's only a cosmetic problem I think with the printk being wrong. The actual decision in the code should all use the true value. Another way would be to just remove the printk output. -Andi