From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>,
gdt@linuxppc.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Robert Wilkens <robw@optonline.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PPC signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:45:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050812184503.GX7762@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0508122036500.16845@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
* Jan Engelhardt (jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de) wrote:
> >Actually I take it the other way. The wording is awful. But the "unless
> >SA_NODEFER or SA_RESETHAND is set, and then including the signal being
> >delivered". This looks to me that it adds the signal being delivered to
> >the blocked mask unless the SA_NODEFER or SA_RESETHAND is set. I kind of
> >wonder if English is the native language of those that wrote this.
>
> So, if in doubt what is really meant - check which of the two/three/+
> different behaviors the users out there favor most.
Rather, check what happens in practice on other implementations. I don't
have Solaris, HP-UX, Irix, AIX, etc. boxen at hand, but some folks must.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-12 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-09 17:44 Signal handling possibly wrong Bodo Stroesser
2005-08-09 18:26 ` Robert Wilkens
2005-08-09 18:32 ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-08-09 18:39 ` Robert Wilkens
2005-08-09 18:44 ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-08-09 19:04 ` Robert Wilkens
2005-08-09 19:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-09 19:41 ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-08-09 20:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-09 20:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-09 20:49 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-09 21:00 ` [PATCH] Fix i386 signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask (was: Re: Signal handling possibly wrong) Steven Rostedt
2005-08-09 21:06 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-09 21:07 ` [PATCH] Fix PPC signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask Steven Rostedt
2005-08-09 21:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-10 3:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-10 3:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-12 18:37 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-08-12 18:45 ` Chris Wright [this message]
2005-08-12 18:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-12 19:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-12 19:31 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-08-12 21:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-14 11:24 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-08-12 21:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-14 22:04 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-08-13 18:47 ` Marc Ballarin
2005-08-10 9:44 ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-08-09 21:04 ` Signal handling possibly wrong Chris Wright
2005-08-10 9:11 ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-08-10 16:20 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-09 19:33 ` Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
2005-08-09 18:50 ` smbus driver for ati xpress 200m yhlu
2005-08-09 22:57 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-10 2:51 ` yhlu
2005-08-10 7:27 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050812184503.GX7762@shell0.pdx.osdl.net \
--to=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com \
--cc=gdt@linuxppc.org \
--cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robw@optonline.net \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome