From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932597AbVHOA0T (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Aug 2005 20:26:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932598AbVHOA0T (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Aug 2005 20:26:19 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:47546 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932597AbVHOA0S (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Aug 2005 20:26:18 -0400 Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 17:26:00 -0700 From: Pete Zaitcev To: Con Kolivas Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: usb camera failing in 2.6.13-rc6 Message-Id: <20050814172600.71a4a8cc.zaitcev@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <200508150929.21402.kernel@kolivas.org> References: <200508141842.13209.kernel@kolivas.org> <20050814115648.4f12f1ec.zaitcev@redhat.com> <200508150929.21402.kernel@kolivas.org> Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.6.7; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 09:29:20 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: > > Remember that dmesg diff you sent? That's the one. If you strace > > the digikamcameracl, it probably keels over after EBUSY. > > Nice shot! Got it in one. bugzilla updated with confirmation. > > So how do we proceed with this one? Do I need to file a digikam bug > report too? Since I never encountered it, I'm not versed in the switching of the current altsetting. I suppose, this has to be discussed between digikam developers and linux-usb-devel (Alan Stern probably knows how that has to be done). It's very likely that all digikam needs is to claim the interface after the altsetting was switched... But I really do not know. -- Pete