From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750816AbVHQDdp (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2005 23:33:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750817AbVHQDdp (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2005 23:33:45 -0400 Received: from dsl027-180-204.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.204]:20663 "EHLO outer-richmond.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750816AbVHQDdo (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2005 23:33:44 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 20:33:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20050816.203312.77701192.davem@davemloft.net> To: paulus@samba.org Cc: galak@freescale.com, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppc32: removed usage of From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <17154.38156.13295.731022@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <17154.38156.13295.731022@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Paul Mackerras Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:38:20 +1000 > Kumar Gala writes: > > > Made a dummy include like it is in ppc64 and removed any > > users if it in arch/ppc. > > Why can't we just delete asm-ppc/segment.h (and asm-ppc64/segment.h > too, for that matter) entirely? I concur, in fact we should really kill that thing off entirely.