mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: Multi-sector writes
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 09:58:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050819075808.GB1825@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4305676E.5080401@drzeus.cx>

Hi!

> >>* Transport problem. The driver will report back a CRC error, timeout or
> >>whatnot and break. We might not know how many sectors survived so we try
> >>again, going sector-by-sector. We might get a transfer error again,
> >>possibly even before the previous one. But at this point the transport
> >>is probably so noisy that we have little chans of doing a clean umount
> >>anyway. So when the device gets fixed, either by replaying the journal
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >Well, but then you can get:
> >
> >good data #1
> >trash #2
> >good data #2
> >trash #1
> >
> >I'm not sure how much journalling filesystems will like that in their journals...
> 
> Unless the card is horribly broken it will not write sectors that cannot
> be transfered successfully. If there would be a transport error that
> goes undetected by the CRC we would just continue, believing that
> everything is peachy.
> 
> The scenario you're describing could show up in the case of a media
> error though. But that would mean that a sector went bad in an extremely
> short time, which isn't likely unless the wear leveling has gone crazy
> or the card is completely worn out. Either way the card is no longer useful.

Maybe the card is pretty close to going to crash, but... two disk
successive disk errors still should not be cause for journal
corruption.

[Also errors could be corelated. Imagine severe overheat. You'll
successive failing writes, but if you let cool it down, you'll still
have working media... only with corrupt journal :-)]
								Pavel
-- 
if you have sharp zaurus hardware you don't need... you know my address

  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-19  7:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-14 12:41 Pierre Ossman
2005-08-17 22:56 ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-18  5:48   ` Pierre Ossman
2005-08-18  5:48     ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-18  6:38       ` Russell King
2005-08-18  7:26         ` Pierre Ossman
2005-08-18  8:23           ` Russell King
2005-08-18  8:48             ` Pierre Ossman
2005-08-18 20:19               ` Pavel Machek
2005-08-19  5:00                 ` Pierre Ossman
2005-08-19  7:58                   ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2005-08-19  8:12                     ` Pierre Ossman
2005-08-18  9:42           ` Alan Cox
2005-08-18  9:33             ` Pierre Ossman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050819075808.GB1825@elf.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=drzeus-list@drzeus.cx \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®