mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kurt Wall <kwall@kurtwerks.com>
To: Nathan Becker <nbecker@physics.ucsb.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: lost ticks and Hangcheck
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 05:45:00 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050819094500.GB16279@kurtwerks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0508182351460.6338@claven.physics.ucsb.edu>

On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 12:41:07AM -0700, Nathan Becker took 37 lines to write:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm running kernel 2.6.12.5 with x86_64 target on an AMD X2 4800+ and 
> Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-SLI motherboard (bios version F8).  I'm having a problem 
> with lost clock ticks.  The dmesg says
> 
> warning: many lost ticks.
> Your time source seems to be instable or some driver is hogging interupts
> 
> Also if I enable hangcheck, then I get a huge number of Hangcheck messages 
> in dmesg.
> 
> The main other symptom is that the system clock runs fast and 
> inaccurately.  It seems to run more inaccurately when I'm using the CPU, 
> and be basically OK when idling.
> 
> I've tried various workarounds that I found suggested on this list and 
> others but the problem is still there.  I tried using noapic, turning on 
> RTC interrupt, also no_timer_check.  I also tried patching the CPU 
> frequency scaling code with the latest version from the AMD website 
> (1.50.03), and then finally turning that option off. Nothing helped.

I use the no_timer_check kernel parm and that keeps the clock from
running at double speed. I still see some other annoying boot-time
messages related to timers, but at least my time source is sane:

..MP-BIOS bug: 8254 timer not connected to IO-APIC
 failed.
timer doesn't work through the IO-APIC - disabling NMI Watchdog!
Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 3d.
Dazed and confused, but trying to continue
Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled?
 works.
Using local APIC timer interrupts.
Detected 12.436 MHz APIC timer.
testing NMI watchdog ... CPU#0: NMI appears to be stuck (1->1)!

Kurt
-- 
"I think it is true for all _\bn. I was just playing it safe with _\bn >= 3
because I couldn't remember the proof."
		-- Baker, Pure Math 351a

  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-19  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-19  7:41 Nathan Becker
2005-08-19  9:45 ` Kurt Wall [this message]
2005-08-20  0:22   ` Nathan Becker
2005-08-20  0:34     ` john stultz
2005-08-20  9:50       ` Nathan Becker
2005-08-30 13:47 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2005-09-04 11:39   ` 2.6.13 SMP on Athlon X2: nanosleep returning waay to soon, clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME...) proceeding too fast Frank van Maarseveen
2005-09-04 14:27     ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050819094500.GB16279@kurtwerks.com \
    --to=kwall@kurtwerks.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nbecker@physics.ucsb.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®