From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750917AbVHUJuo (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Aug 2005 05:50:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750931AbVHUJun (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Aug 2005 05:50:43 -0400 Received: from siaag2ah.compuserve.com ([149.174.40.141]:28511 "EHLO siaag2ah.compuserve.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750917AbVHUJun (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Aug 2005 05:50:43 -0400 Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 05:47:36 -0400 From: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.13-rc6] i386: semaphore ownership tracking To: Lee Revell Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org, ak@suse.de, mingo@elte.hu, Andrew Morton Message-ID: <200508210550_MC3-1-A7CF-D29F@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 15:01:27 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > How is it different from the ownership tracking used for PI in the -rt > kernel? Those are a completely new type of mutex (rt_mutex.) Mine is a very low-overhead (3 extra instructions in down()) addition to the normal Linux semaphores. I guess they are called compat_semaphores in -rt, and I didn't see any ownership tracking for them in the -rt patch. __ Chuck