From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751438AbVHVWgj (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2005 18:36:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751402AbVHVWgi (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2005 18:36:38 -0400 Received: from fmr24.intel.com ([143.183.121.16]:52440 "EHLO scsfmr004.sc.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751472AbVHVWeV (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2005 18:34:21 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:33:16 -0700 From: tony.luck@intel.com Message-Id: <200508222233.j7MMXGWj020872@agluck-lia64.sc.intel.com> To: Andrew Morton To: "David S. Miller" Cc: jasonuhl@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME woes In-Reply-To: <20050822141555.55276f3a.akpm@osdl.org> References: <200508221742.j7MHgMJI020020@agluck-lia64.sc.intel.com> <20050822.132052.65406121.davem@davemloft.net> <20050822203306.GA897956@dragonfly.engr.sgi.com> <20050822.134226.35468933.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >How fast is printk? I haven't looked. > >ie: if you do back-to-back printk's, what's the timestamp increment? On ia64 it looks like about 4-5 usec increment for back-to-back printk (with no serial console configured, and dmesg -n to turn off messages to the VGA console). -Tony