From: Denis Vlasenko <vda@ilport.com.ua>
To: "linux-os \(Dick Johnson\)" <linux-os@analogic.com>,
"Robert Hancock" <hancockr@shaw.ca>
Cc: "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sched_yield() makes OpenLDAP slow
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:07:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200508231507.02252.vda@ilport.com.ua> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0508230714180.22122@chaos.analogic.com>
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 14:17, linux-os \(Dick Johnson\) wrote:
>
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Robert Hancock wrote:
>
> > linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:
> >> I reported thet sched_yield() wasn't working (at least as expected)
> >> back in March of 2004.
> >>
> >> for(;;)
> >> sched_yield();
> >>
> >> ... takes 100% CPU time as reported by `top`. It should take
> >> practically 0. Somebody said that this was because `top` was
> >> broken, others said that it was because I didn't know how to
> >> code. Nevertheless, the problem was not fixed, even after
> >> schedular changes were made for the current version.
> >
> > This is what I would expect if run on an otherwise idle machine.
> > sched_yield just puts you at the back of the line for runnable
> > processes, it doesn't magically cause you to go to sleep somehow.
> >
>
> When a kernel build is occurring??? Plus `top` itself.... It damn
> well sleep while giving up the CPU. If it doesn't it's broken.
top doesn't run all the time:
# strace -o top.strace -tt top
14:52:19.407958 write(1, " 758 root 16 0 104 2"..., 79) = 79
14:52:19.408318 write(1, " 759 root 16 0 100 1"..., 79) = 79
14:52:19.408659 write(1, " 760 root 16 0 100 1"..., 79) = 79
14:52:19.409001 write(1, " 761 root 18 0 2604 39"..., 74) = 74
14:52:19.409342 write(1, " 763 daemon 17 0 108 1"..., 78) = 78
14:52:19.409672 write(1, " 773 root 16 0 104 2"..., 79) = 79
14:52:19.410010 write(1, " 774 root 16 0 104 2"..., 79) = 79
14:52:19.410362 write(1, " 775 root 16 0 100 1"..., 79) = 79
14:52:19.410692 write(1, " 776 root 16 0 104 2"..., 79) = 79
14:52:19.411136 write(1, " 777 daemon 17 0 108 1"..., 86) = 86
14:52:19.411505 select(1, [0], NULL, NULL, {5, 0}) = 0 (Timeout)
hrrr..... psssss.......
14:52:24.411744 time([1124797944]) = 1124797944
14:52:24.411883 lseek(4, 0, SEEK_SET) = 0
14:52:24.411957 read(4, "24822.01 18801.28\n", 1023) = 18
14:52:24.412082 access("/var/run/utmpx", F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
14:52:24.412224 open("/var/run/utmp", O_RDWR) = 8
14:52:24.412328 fcntl64(8, F_GETFD) = 0
14:52:24.412399 fcntl64(8, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0
14:52:24.412467 _llseek(8, 0, [0], SEEK_SET) = 0
14:52:24.412556 alarm(0) = 0
14:52:24.412643 rt_sigaction(SIGALRM, {0x4015a57c, [], SA_RESTORER, 0x40094ae8}, {SIG_DFL}, 8) = 0
14:52:24.412747 alarm(1) = 0
However, kernel compile shouldn't.
I suggest stracing with -tt "for(;;) yield();" test proggy with and without
kernel compile in parallel, and comparing the output...
Hmm... actually, knowing that you will argue to death instead...
# cat t.c
#include <sched.h>
int main() {
for(;;) sched_yield();
return 0;
}
# gcc t.c
# strace -tt ./a.out
...
15:03:41.211324 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:41.211673 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:41.212034 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:41.212400 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:41.212749 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:41.213126 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:41.213486 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:41.213835 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:41.214220 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:41.214577 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:41.214939 sched_yield() = 0
I start "while true; do true; done" on another console...
15:03:43.314645 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:43.847644 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:43.954635 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:44.063798 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:44.171596 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:44.282624 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:44.391632 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:44.498609 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:44.605584 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:44.712538 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:44.819557 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:44.928594 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:45.040603 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:45.148545 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:45.259311 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:45.368563 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:45.476482 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:45.583568 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:45.690491 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:45.797512 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:45.906534 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:46.013545 sched_yield() = 0
15:03:46.120505 sched_yield() = 0
Ctrl-C
# uname -a
Linux firebird 2.6.12-r4 #1 SMP Sun Jul 17 13:51:47 EEST 2005 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux
--
vda
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-23 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4D8eT-4rg-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-08-20 3:20 ` Robert Hancock
2005-08-20 4:18 ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-20 18:38 ` Howard Chu
2005-08-20 20:57 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-20 21:24 ` Howard Chu
2005-08-21 0:36 ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-21 11:33 ` Nikita Danilov
2005-08-22 8:06 ` Howard Chu
2005-08-20 21:50 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-21 1:04 ` Robert Hancock
2005-08-22 11:44 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-08-22 14:26 ` Robert Hancock
2005-08-23 11:17 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-08-23 12:07 ` Denis Vlasenko [this message]
2005-08-24 3:37 ` Lincoln Dale
2006-01-24 22:59 e100 oops on resume Stefan Seyfried
2006-01-24 23:21 ` Mattia Dongili
2006-01-25 9:02 ` Olaf Kirch
2006-01-25 12:11 ` Olaf Kirch
2006-01-25 13:51 ` sched_yield() makes OpenLDAP slow Howard Chu
2006-01-25 14:38 ` Robert Hancock
2006-01-25 17:49 ` Christopher Friesen
2006-01-26 1:07 ` David Schwartz
2006-01-26 8:30 ` Helge Hafting
2006-01-26 9:01 ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-26 10:50 ` Nikita Danilov
[not found] <5uZqb-4fo-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-01-14 22:47 ` Robert Hancock
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-14 19:29 Howard Chu
[not found] <43057641.70700@symas.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <17157.45712.877795.437505@gargle.gargle.HOWL.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <430666DB.70802@symas.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2005-08-20 13:48 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-21 19:47 ` Florian Weimer
2005-08-22 5:09 ` Howard Chu
2005-08-22 13:06 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-22 18:47 ` Howard Chu
2005-08-22 13:20 ` Florian Weimer
2005-08-22 23:19 ` Howard Chu
2005-08-19 6:03 Howard Chu
2005-08-19 6:34 ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-19 6:59 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-19 22:45 ` Howard Chu
2005-08-19 10:21 ` Nikita Danilov
2005-08-19 23:10 ` Howard Chu
2005-08-20 13:23 ` Nikita Danilov
2005-08-20 19:49 ` Howard Chu
2005-08-20 22:08 ` Nikita Danilov
[not found] <4303DB48.8010902@develer.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20050818010703.GA13127@nineveh.rivenstone.net.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <4303F967.6000404@yahoo.com.au.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <43054D9A.7090509@develer.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2005-08-19 3:19 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-19 3:30 ` Bernardo Innocenti
2005-08-18 0:50 Bernardo Innocenti
2005-08-18 0:47 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-18 10:48 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2005-08-18 1:07 ` Joseph Fannin
2005-08-18 2:25 ` Bernardo Innocenti
2005-08-18 2:58 ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-19 3:10 ` Bernardo Innocenti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200508231507.02252.vda@ilport.com.ua \
--to=vda@ilport.com.ua \
--cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-os@analogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome