From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932269AbVHWS2n (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:28:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932272AbVHWS2m (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:28:42 -0400 Received: from outpost.ds9a.nl ([213.244.168.210]:20645 "EHLO outpost.ds9a.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932269AbVHWS2m (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:28:42 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 20:24:05 +0200 From: bert hubert To: Davy Durham Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: select() efficiency / epoll Message-ID: <20050823182405.GA21301@outpost.ds9a.nl> Mail-Followup-To: bert hubert , Davy Durham , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <42E162B6.2000602@davyandbeth.com> <20050722212454.GB18988@outpost.ds9a.nl> <430AF11A.5000303@davyandbeth.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <430AF11A.5000303@davyandbeth.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 04:49:14AM -0500, Davy Durham wrote: > However, I'm getting segfaults because some pointers in places are > getting set to low integer values (which didn't used to have those values). epoll is pretty heavily benchmarked and hence tested. I don't entirely understand the remark above and suggest looking at the generated core dumps. -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software http://netherlabs.nl Open and Closed source services