From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750924AbVHXC54 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Aug 2005 22:57:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750923AbVHXC54 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Aug 2005 22:57:56 -0400 Received: from ylpvm29-ext.prodigy.net ([207.115.57.60]:55701 "EHLO ylpvm29.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750710AbVHXC54 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Aug 2005 22:57:56 -0400 X-ORBL: [67.124.117.85] Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:57:40 -0700 From: Chris Wedgwood To: robotti@godmail.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro Subject: Re: Initramfs and TMPFS! Message-ID: <20050824025740.GA3361@taniwha.stupidest.org> References: <200508232205.j7NM5l1g018046@ms-smtp-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200508232205.j7NM5l1g018046@ms-smtp-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 06:05:47PM -0400, robotti@godmail.com wrote: > I was just making a suggestion to whoever it may concern, because I > think it would extend the usefullness of initramfs. I have a path for initramfs to use tmpfs. It's sorta hacky so I never submitted it and solves a niche problem for embedded people. Ultimately we might one day still want to change how we initialize the early userspace (Al suggesting a reasomably nice way to move the decompressor(s) to userspace for example) so I don't feel there is a compelling reason to do more than cleanups in this area right now.