From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932466AbVHYBWX (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2005 21:22:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932467AbVHYBWX (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2005 21:22:23 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:424 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932466AbVHYBWX (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2005 21:22:23 -0400 Message-Id: <20050825012028.720597000@localhost.localdomain> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 18:20:28 -0700 From: Chris Wright To: linux-security-module@wirex.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kurt Garloff Subject: [PATCH 0/5] LSM hook updates Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is based on Kurt's original work. The net effect is that LSM hooks are called conditionally, and in all cases capabilities provide the defaults. I've done some basic performance testing, and found nothing surprising. I'm interested to see numbers from others before I push this up. These are against Linus' current git tree (they will clash with the -mm tree). security/dummy.c | 996 ---------------------------- include/linux/security.h | 1665 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- security/Makefile | 9 security/commoncap.c | 160 ++-- security/root_plug.c | 14 security/security.c | 62 - 6 files changed, 839 insertions(+), 2067 deletions(-) thanks, -chris --