From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S964986AbVHYNsA@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S964986AbVHYNsA (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:48:00 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964988AbVHYNsA
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:48:00 -0400
Received: from ylpvm43-ext.prodigy.net ([207.115.57.74]:25061 "EHLO
	ylpvm43.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964986AbVHYNr7
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:47:59 -0400
X-ORBL: [67.124.117.85]
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 06:47:48 -0700
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
To: robotti@godmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Initramfs and TMPFS!
Message-ID: <20050825134748.GA6703@taniwha.stupidest.org>
References: <200508250432.j7P4WoGe020067@ms-smtp-02.rdc-nyc.rr.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200508250432.j7P4WoGe020067@ms-smtp-02.rdc-nyc.rr.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 12:32:50AM -0400, robotti@godmail.com wrote:

> Right, but it would be nice to have that option if initramfs
> using tmpfs becomes part of the kernel.

But it's not needed so why add bloat?