mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@istop.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1 of 4] Configfs is really sysfs
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:13:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050830231307.GE22068@insight.us.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200508310854.40482.phillips@istop.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 888 bytes --]

On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 08:54:39AM +1000, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> But it would be stupid to forbid users from creating directories in sysfs or 
> to forbid kernel modules from directly tweaking a configfs namespace.  Why 
> should the kernel not be able to add objects to a directory a user created?  
> It should be up to the module author to decide these things.

	This is precisely why configfs is separate from sysfs.  If both
user and kernel can create objects, the lifetime of the object and its
filesystem representation is very complex.  Sysfs already has problems
with people getting this wrong.  configfs does not.
	The fact that sysfs and configfs have similar backing stores
does not make them the same thing.

Joel

-- 

"Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain."
	- Freidrich von Schiller

			http://www.jlbec.org/
			jlbec@evilplan.org

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-08-30 23:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-30 22:54 Daniel Phillips
2005-08-30 22:57 ` [RFC][PATCH 2 " Daniel Phillips
2005-08-30 22:59   ` [RFC][PATCH 3 " Daniel Phillips
2005-08-30 23:03     ` [RFC][PATCH 4 " Daniel Phillips
2005-08-30 23:30       ` Daniel Phillips
2005-08-30 23:06     ` [RFC][PATCH 3 " Stephen Hemminger
2005-08-30 23:18       ` Daniel Phillips
2005-08-30 23:10     ` Daniel Phillips
2005-08-30 23:22   ` [RFC][PATCH 2 " Daniel Phillips
2005-08-30 23:13 ` Joel Becker [this message]
2005-08-30 23:25   ` [RFC][PATCH 1 " Daniel Phillips
2005-08-30 23:35     ` Daniel Phillips
2005-08-30 23:28   ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-30 23:34     ` viro
2005-08-30 23:51       ` Daniel Phillips
2005-08-30 23:37     ` Daniel Phillips
2005-08-31  0:03     ` Joel Becker
2005-09-04  3:53     ` Joel Becker
2005-09-04  4:12       ` Joel Becker
2005-09-04  4:41         ` Joel Becker
2005-09-04  4:54           ` Joel Becker
2005-09-07 20:31             ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050830231307.GE22068@insight.us.oracle.com \
    --to=joel.becker@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phillips@istop.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome