From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030447AbVIAWJ6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2005 18:09:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030446AbVIAWJ6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2005 18:09:58 -0400 Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:18898 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030442AbVIAWJ5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2005 18:09:57 -0400 Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 15:09:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20050901.150948.105511552.davem@davemloft.net> To: bunk@stusta.de Cc: wensong@linux-vs.org, ja@ssi.bg, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] include/net/ip_vs.h: "extern inline" -> "static inline" From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20050824155806.GF4851@stusta.de> References: <20050824155806.GF4851@stusta.de> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Adrian Bunk Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:58:06 +0200 > "extern inline" doesn't make much sense. > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk Applied, thanks Adrian.