mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCHES] kbuild updates
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 03:28:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050906012828.GB7562@mars.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200509052232.04135.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk>

> > > How is this different from the preempt module vermagic?
> > >
> > > ~$ modinfo agpgart | grep vermagic
> > > vermagic:       2.6.13 preempt gcc-4.0
> >
> > My bad. Adding PREEMT to UTS_VERSION makes it visible in uname -a.
> >
> 
> I see. I can understand adding an extraversion for SMP and experimental 
> patches (like Ingo's RT work), but why is it useful to differentiate (by 
> name) between preempt and non-preempt kernels? Do distributors wish to 
> package both in parallel?

PREEMPT is in UTS_VERSION for the same reason as being present in
vermagic. It is one of these options being so fundamentally that we like
to both test for it and to know it when runinng uname.

	Sam

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-06  1:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-05 17:41 Sam Ravnborg
2005-09-05 19:35 ` Alistair John Strachan
2005-09-05 20:13   ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-09-05 21:32     ` Alistair John Strachan
2005-09-06  1:28       ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2005-09-06  1:38       ` Matt Mackall
2006-01-06 21:03 Sam Ravnborg
2006-01-09 21:11 Sam Ravnborg
2006-01-10 16:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-06-24 22:22 Sam Ravnborg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050906012828.GB7562@mars.ravnborg.org \
    --to=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®