mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Omnikey Cardman 4000 driver
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 08:59:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050906065951.GA14984@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a874849050905133650caa09e@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1343 bytes --]

On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 10:36:57PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 9/6/05, Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org> wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> [snip]
> > 
> > Please consider mergin mainline, thanks.
> > 
> [snip]
> 
> Wouldn't it be better to first merge it in -mm and get some wider
> testing before pushing for mainline?

From my past experience (I'm involved in writing smartcard reader
drivers for some time now), users of smartcard readers tend to be
"typical corporate users" who won't run anything but the distribution
kernel.  

I really doubt that the drivers would get much more testing in -mm than
they would in mainline.

Also, what is the point of putting entirely new code (no changes to
existing code!) into -mm?  I understand that changes to existing code
can inarguably benefit from some testing in -mm first.

But new drivers?  Where's the point?  The devices are not supported in
the existing kernel, so it cannot get worse by having a driver (even if
it still contains one or the other bug).

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>          	        http://gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2005-09-06  6:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-06  1:35 Harald Welte
2005-09-05 19:44 ` Nish Aravamudan
2005-09-07  7:06   ` Harald Welte
2005-09-05 20:29 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-09-05 20:36 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-09-06  6:59   ` Harald Welte [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050906065951.GA14984@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org \
    --to=laforge@gnumonks.org \
    --cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®