From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750780AbVIGCid (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2005 22:38:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750796AbVIGCid (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2005 22:38:33 -0400 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:48558 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750780AbVIGCic (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2005 22:38:32 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 19:38:07 -0700 From: Paul Jackson To: Jesper Juhl Cc: akpm@osdl.org, bunk@stusta.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.13-mm1 Message-Id: <20050906193807.472228b5.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <9a87484905090617444e89722d@mail.gmail.com> References: <20050901035542.1c621af6.akpm@osdl.org> <20050903122126.GM3657@stusta.de> <20050903123410.1320f8ab.akpm@osdl.org> <20050903195423.GP3657@stusta.de> <20050903130632.3124e19b.akpm@osdl.org> <9a87484905090414245589a3c@mail.gmail.com> <20050904143033.13a4bed3.akpm@osdl.org> <20050906170513.60ed024a.pj@sgi.com> <9a87484905090617444e89722d@mail.gmail.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.0beta5 (GTK+ 2.4.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jesper wrote: > Something like that would be just fine for the > patches that have been sent on to Linus. No - not just the patches sent to Linus - that's a burden on Andrew to separate things out. Andrew can put the boiler plate statement on _all_ drop messages > If I just sent the patch to Linus, that is > probably why I dropped it here. At the very least, he gets to cuss us out for not being able to read, instead of not being able to associate the 'patch to Linus' message with the 'drop' message a few hours later. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401