From: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ralf@linux-mips.org, macro@linux-mips.org, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: [PATCH] more sigkill priority fix
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 01:24:50 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050908.012450.41200025.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> (raw)
On Linux/MIPS, a simple test program can create unkillable process.
The "sigkill priority fix" was introduced in 2.6.12, but it does not
effective for signals sent by force_sig() in kernel. For detailed
behavior and testcase, please look at this thread in linux-mips ML:
http://www.linux-mips.org/cgi-bin/mesg.cgi?a=linux-mips&i=20050907.014234.108739386.anemo%40mba.ocn.ne.jp
Here is a proposal fix for generic signal handling code.
Patch comment:
The "sigkill priority fix" does not work as it desired if any signal
(< SIGKILL) was queued by force_sig() in kernel. Search SIGKILL in
tsk->pending and tsk->signal->shared_pending first, then search
another signals.
Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
--- linux-2.6.13/kernel/signal.c 2005-08-29 08:41:01.000000000 +0900
+++ linux/kernel/signal.c 2005-09-07 01:33:52.338420760 +0900
@@ -520,19 +520,14 @@
}
static int __dequeue_signal(struct sigpending *pending, sigset_t *mask,
- siginfo_t *info)
+ siginfo_t *info, int sig)
{
- int sig = 0;
-
- /* SIGKILL must have priority, otherwise it is quite easy
- * to create an unkillable process, sending sig < SIGKILL
- * to self */
- if (unlikely(sigismember(&pending->signal, SIGKILL))) {
- if (!sigismember(mask, SIGKILL))
- sig = SIGKILL;
- }
-
- if (likely(!sig))
+ if (sig) {
+ /* check signal with priority first */
+ if (likely(!sigismember(&pending->signal, sig)) ||
+ sigismember(mask, sig))
+ sig = 0;
+ } else
sig = next_signal(pending, mask);
if (sig) {
if (current->notifier) {
@@ -561,10 +556,18 @@
*/
int dequeue_signal(struct task_struct *tsk, sigset_t *mask, siginfo_t *info)
{
- int signr = __dequeue_signal(&tsk->pending, mask, info);
+ /* SIGKILL must have priority, otherwise it is quite easy
+ * to create an unkillable process, sending sig < SIGKILL
+ * to self */
+ int signr = __dequeue_signal(&tsk->pending, mask, info, SIGKILL);
+ if (likely(!signr))
+ signr = __dequeue_signal(&tsk->signal->shared_pending,
+ mask, info, SIGKILL);
+ if (likely(!signr))
+ signr = __dequeue_signal(&tsk->pending, mask, info, 0);
if (!signr)
signr = __dequeue_signal(&tsk->signal->shared_pending,
- mask, info);
+ mask, info, 0);
if (signr && unlikely(sig_kernel_stop(signr))) {
/*
* Set a marker that we have dequeued a stop signal. Our
---
Atsushi Nemoto
next reply other threads:[~2005-09-07 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-07 16:24 Atsushi Nemoto [this message]
2005-09-16 16:17 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2005-09-19 8:24 ` Heiko Carstens
2005-09-19 8:46 ` Roland McGrath
2005-09-19 8:57 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2005-09-19 9:08 ` Roland McGrath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050908.012450.41200025.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp \
--to=anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®