From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S932081AbVIJQfS@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932081AbVIJQfS (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Sat, 10 Sep 2005 12:35:18 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751041AbVIJQfS
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sat, 10 Sep 2005 12:35:18 -0400
Received: from ylpvm29-ext.prodigy.net ([207.115.57.60]:62874 "EHLO
	ylpvm29.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751027AbVIJQfR (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 10 Sep 2005 12:35:17 -0400
X-ORBL: [67.124.117.85]
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 09:34:46 -0700
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Jim Gifford <maillist@jg555.com>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Pure 64 bootloaders
Message-ID: <20050910163446.GA2232@taniwha.stupidest.org>
References: <43228E4E.4050103@jg555.com> <p73k6hp2up7.fsf@verdi.suse.de> <43229BA4.4010306@pobox.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <43229BA4.4010306@pobox.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 04:39:00AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:

> /lib64 is an awful scheme.  I'd avoid it.

I'd like to see people move away from it before it gets too entrenched
too.

What does ppc64 and sparc64 use btw?