From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964975AbVIMSge (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:36:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964977AbVIMSgd (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:36:33 -0400 Received: from 66-23-228-155.clients.speedfactory.net ([66.23.228.155]:44965 "EHLO kevlar.burdell.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964975AbVIMSgc (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:36:32 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:32:15 -0400 From: Sonny Rao To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, anton@samba.org, linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: 2.6.13-mm3 Message-ID: <20050913183215.GA28596@kevlar.burdell.org> Mail-Followup-To: Sonny Rao , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, anton@samba.org, linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org References: <20050912024350.60e89eb1.akpm@osdl.org> <20050912145435.GA4722@kevlar.burdell.org> <20050912125641.4b53553d.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050912125641.4b53553d.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 12:56:41PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Sonny Rao wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 02:43:50AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > - There are several performance tuning patches here which need careful > > > attention and testing. (Does anyone do performance testing any more?) > > > > > > > > - The size of the page allocator per-cpu magazines has been increased > > > > > > - The page allocator has been changed to use higher-order allocations > > > when batch-loading the per-cpu magazines. This is intended to give > > > improved cache colouring effects however it might have the downside of > > > causing extra page allocator fragmentation. > > > > > > - The page allocator's per-cpu magazines have had their lower threshold > > > set to zero. And we can't remember why it ever had a lower threshold. > > > > > > > What would you like? The usual suspects: SDET, dbench, kernbench ? > > > > That would be a good start, thanks. The higher-order-allocations thing is > mainly targeted at big-iron numerical computing I believe. > > I've already had one report of fragmentation-derived page allocator > failures (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5229). Ok, I'm getting much further on ppc64 thanks to Anton B. So far, I need patched in the hvc console fix, Anton's SCSI fix for 2.6.14-rc1, Paulus's EEH fix, and I reverted remove-near-all-bugs-in-mm-mempolicyc.patch and convert-mempolicies-to-nodemask_t.patch I got most of the way through the boot scripts and crashed while bringing up the loopback interface. Here's the latest PPC64 crash on 2.6.13-mm3: smp_call_function on cpu 5: other cpus not responding (5) cpu 0x5: Vector: 0 at [c00000000f3b6b00] pc: 000000000000003d lr: 000000000000003d sp: c00000000f3b6a90 msr: 8000000000009032 current = 0xc000000002018050 paca = 0xc00000000048a400 pid = 1679, comm = ip enter ? for help 5:mon> t (xmon hangs here) Anyone have ideas on what to try?