mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Dipankar <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
	paulmck@us.ibm.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] NO_IDLE_HZ support patches - Fix RCU race condition
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 14:20:44 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050915085044.GB10191@in.ibm.com> (raw)

The patch below, against 2.6.14-rc1, fixes a race condition wherein a CPU can 
set itself in the nohz_cpu_mask just after a new grace period is started. If 
the CPU continues to skip ticks after that, it can cause the grace
period that was started to be extended unnecessarily.



Signed-off-by : Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>

---

 linux-2.6.14-rc1-root/kernel/rcupdate.c |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -puN kernel/rcupdate.c~rcu_race_fix kernel/rcupdate.c
--- linux-2.6.14-rc1/kernel/rcupdate.c~rcu_race_fix	2005-09-13 18:17:32.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.14-rc1-root/kernel/rcupdate.c	2005-09-13 18:17:42.000000000 +0530
@@ -86,6 +86,30 @@ spinlock_t __rcuref_hash[RCUREF_HASH_SIZ
 };
 #endif
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_NO_IDLE_HZ
+static inline int batch_complete(struct rcu_state *rsp)
+{
+	int rc = 0;
+	cpumask_t tmpmask;
+
+	cpus_andnot(tmpmask, rsp->cpumask, nohz_cpu_mask);
+	if (cpus_empty(tmpmask))
+		rc = 1;
+
+	return rc;
+}
+#else
+static inline int batch_complete(struct rcu_state *rsp)
+{
+	int rc = 0;
+
+	if (cpus_empty(rsp->cpumask))
+		rc = 1;
+
+	return rc;
+}
+#endif
+
 /**
  * call_rcu - Queue an RCU callback for invocation after a grace period.
  * @head: structure to be used for queueing the RCU updates.
@@ -197,7 +221,13 @@ static void rcu_start_batch(struct rcu_c
 
 	if (rcp->next_pending &&
 			rcp->completed == rcp->cur) {
-		/* Can't change, since spin lock held. */
+		/* cpu_online_map can't change, since a spinlock is held.
+		 * However nohz_cpu_mask can change as we read it. A bad
+		 * case of this race is when a CPU sets itself in the
+		 * nohz_cpu_mask just after we have read it. We take care of
+		 * this bad case when other CPUs call batch_complete() to check
+		 * for batch completion.
+		 */
 		cpus_andnot(rsp->cpumask, cpu_online_map, nohz_cpu_mask);
 
 		rcp->next_pending = 0;
@@ -217,7 +247,7 @@ static void rcu_start_batch(struct rcu_c
 static void cpu_quiet(int cpu, struct rcu_ctrlblk *rcp, struct rcu_state *rsp)
 {
 	cpu_clear(cpu, rsp->cpumask);
-	if (cpus_empty(rsp->cpumask)) {
+	if (batch_complete(rsp)) {
 		/* batch completed ! */
 		rcp->completed = rcp->cur;
 		rcu_start_batch(rcp, rsp, 0);

_
-- 


Thanks and Regards,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri,
Linux Technology Center,
IBM Software Labs,
Bangalore, INDIA - 560017

                 reply	other threads:[~2005-09-15  8:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050915085044.GB10191@in.ibm.com \
    --to=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®