mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ahmad Reza Cheraghi <a_r_cheraghi@yahoo.com>
To: marekw1977@yahoo.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Automatic Configuration of a Kernel
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 02:48:42 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050915094842.31636.qmail@web51003.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200509151733.16569.marekw1977@yahoo.com.au>



--- Marek W <marekw1977@yahoo.com.au> wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 16:18, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
> wrote:
> 
> Wasn't I being optimistic :) but hey, it's good to
> see that many modules.
> 
> > > I'd prefer for something to select the modules
> necessary for my hardware.
> > > I can't afford the time to keep up to date with
> that's new and what
> > > isn't, what has changed, what has been
> superseded, which module works
> > > with which device, chipset even, etc...
> >
> > I'm of the opinion that if you don't have that
> much time, you should be
> > using a distro kernel where somebody *else* is
> taking the time.  If you're
> > the type that builds their own kernel, the *last*
> thing you want is a tool
> > glossing over the fact that a module has been
> superceded.  Who's going to
> > take care of the matching changes for
> /etc/modprobe.conf and similar
> > userspace changes, and other stuff like that? (I
> figure if 'make oldconfig'
> > asks a question, I should take notice, and any
> userspace changes that don't
> > get made are my fault - and if 'make oldconfig'
> switches drivers on me
> > without asking, that's a *bug* that lkml will hear
> about.. ;)
> 
> This is exactly why I switched to Gentoo and use
> gentoo-sources kernel.
>
As far as I know uses Gentoo the configuration that
will be on the live-Cd. So 
1. they might be alot of not needed modules 
2. Some Hardware might be undetected.

> However, keep in mind that when I do 'make
> oldconfig', more often then now the 
> help on new options is insufficient to make a
> decision on whether or not 
> something should be included.
> 
> Secondly, I'd love to know exactly what sort of
> hardware is inside my laptop, 
> but funnily enough I find out the chipsets and
> vendors by running lspci.

The good thing about lspci (comparing to the others
Hardware detection like kudzu or discovery) it not
only uses the /proc files for getting the Hardware
information it also grabs its information directly
from the I/O of the Hardwares. But it lacks of getting
alls the Hardwares e.g. CD-Rom, floppy... 
It would be great if there is a Programm that gets all
the Hardware information directyl from the I/O
independent from the Kernel-installation.    


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-15  9:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-14 22:38 Ahmad Reza Cheraghi
2005-09-14 22:53 ` Michal Piotrowski
2005-09-14 23:49   ` Daniel Thaler
2005-09-15  0:09     ` Marek W
2005-09-15  0:37       ` Hua Zhong
2005-09-15  2:03         ` David Lang
2005-09-15  3:04           ` Lee Revell
2005-09-15  3:37             ` Daniel Thaler
2005-09-15  4:16               ` Lee Revell
2005-09-15  8:12                 ` Ahmad Reza Cheraghi
2005-09-15 11:20                   ` Masoud Sharbiani
2005-09-15 20:58               ` Ahmad Reza Cheraghi
2005-09-15 21:04                 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-09-15  4:18             ` Marek W
2005-09-15  6:18               ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-09-15  7:33                 ` Marek W
2005-09-15  9:48                   ` Ahmad Reza Cheraghi [this message]
2005-09-15 10:44                 ` David Lang
2005-09-15 10:26             ` David Lang
2005-09-15 14:58               ` Nix
2005-09-15 17:08                 ` David Lang
2005-09-15 20:36                 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-09-15 20:50                   ` Nix
2005-09-15  8:53       ` Chris White
2005-09-15  7:58         ` Ahmad Reza Cheraghi
2005-09-15  9:12     ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-09-15  9:56   ` Ahmad Reza Cheraghi
2005-09-16  4:02     ` Chris White
2005-09-16  7:12       ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-09-16 17:38   ` Pavel Machek
2005-09-16 17:50     ` Enrico Weigelt
2005-09-15 11:21 ` Roman Zippel
2005-09-15 12:01   ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-09-15 13:02     ` Ahmad Reza Cheraghi
2005-09-15 13:28       ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-09-15 13:03     ` Ahmad Reza Cheraghi
2005-09-17  1:27     ` Roman Zippel
2005-09-16  8:11 ` Coywolf Qi Hunt
2005-09-16  8:19   ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-09-16  8:32     ` Ahmad Reza Cheraghi
2005-09-16  8:50       ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-09-16  9:19         ` Ahmad Reza Cheraghi
2005-09-26 12:08 Ahmad Reza Cheraghi
2005-09-26 13:57 ` Michal Piotrowski
2005-09-26 14:06 ` Michal Piotrowski
2005-09-27  8:05 ` Coywolf Qi Hunt
2005-09-27  8:11   ` Emmanuel Fleury

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050915094842.31636.qmail@web51003.mail.yahoo.com \
    --to=a_r_cheraghi@yahoo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marekw1977@yahoo.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®