From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750708AbVITXGG (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2005 19:06:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750718AbVITXGF (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2005 19:06:05 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:26342 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750708AbVITXGE (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2005 19:06:04 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 16:06:04 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: "Siddha, Suresh B" Cc: venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] intel_cacheinfo: remove MAX_CACHE_LEAVES limit Message-Id: <20050920160604.5e022fa8.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20050919121435.A10231@unix-os.sc.intel.com> References: <20050919121435.A10231@unix-os.sc.intel.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-vine-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Siddha, Suresh B" wrote: > > Remove the MAX_CACHE_LEAVES limit from the routine which calculates the > number of cache levels using cpuid(4) Why? Why was the code there originally, and why is it required that it be removed, and why is it safe to remove it? (IOW: your description of this patch is inadequate: it describes what was done, but not why it was done). Thanks.