From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>
Cc: vandrove@vc.cvut.cz, alokk@calsoftinc.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, manfred@colorfullife.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.14-rc1-git-now still dying in mm/slab - this time line 1849
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:01:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050922130150.0822b882.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0509221250120.17975@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>
> > Hmm. This likely has something to do with debugging code. I was unable to
> > reproduce this on amd64 with your config. I get another failure with
> > 2.6.14-rc2 on ia64 if I enable all the debugging features that you have.
> > The system works fine if no debugging is configured:
> >
> > kernel BUG at kernel/workqueue.c:541!
> > swapper[1]: bugcheck! 0 [1]
>
> I fixed the above issue (a structure became larger than the maximum
> allowed by the slab allocator) and the kernel boots fine now on an 8 way
> ia64. Cannot reproduce the problem.
Petr can. I think we're still waiting for him to test the below (please):
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:03:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>
To: Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@vc.cvut.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, alokk@calsoftinc.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, manfred@colorfullife.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.14-rc1-git-now still dying in mm/slab - this time line 1849
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> slab belonging to node#1, while having acquired lock for cachep belonging
> to node #0. Due to this check_spinlock_acquired_node(cachep, nodeid) fails
> (check_spinlock_acquired_node(cachep, 0) would succeed).
Hmmm. If a node runs out of memory then pages from another node may end up
on the slab list of a node. But it seems that free_block cannot handle
that properly.
How are you producing the problem?
Could you try the following patch:
---
The numa slab allocator may allocate pages from foreign nodes onto the lists
for a particular node if a node runs out of memory. Inspecting the slab->nodeid
field will not reflect that the page is now in use for the slabs of another node.
This patch fixes that issue by adding a node field to free_block so that the caller
can indicate which node currently uses a slab.
Also removes the check for the current node from kmalloc_cache_node since the
process may shift later to another node which may lead to an allocation on another
node than intended.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Index: linux-2.6.14-rc1/mm/slab.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.14-rc1.orig/mm/slab.c 2005-09-21 00:09:05.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.14-rc1/mm/slab.c 2005-09-21 00:48:12.000000000 +0000
@@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ static enum {
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct work_struct, reap_work);
-static void free_block(kmem_cache_t* cachep, void** objpp, int len);
+static void free_block(kmem_cache_t* cachep, void** objpp, int len, int node);
static void enable_cpucache (kmem_cache_t *cachep);
static void cache_reap (void *unused);
static int __node_shrink(kmem_cache_t *cachep, int node);
@@ -804,7 +804,7 @@ static inline void __drain_alien_cache(k
if (ac->avail) {
spin_lock(&rl3->list_lock);
- free_block(cachep, ac->entry, ac->avail);
+ free_block(cachep, ac->entry, ac->avail, node);
ac->avail = 0;
spin_unlock(&rl3->list_lock);
}
@@ -925,7 +925,7 @@ static int __devinit cpuup_callback(stru
/* Free limit for this kmem_list3 */
l3->free_limit -= cachep->batchcount;
if (nc)
- free_block(cachep, nc->entry, nc->avail);
+ free_block(cachep, nc->entry, nc->avail, node);
if (!cpus_empty(mask)) {
spin_unlock(&l3->list_lock);
@@ -934,7 +934,7 @@ static int __devinit cpuup_callback(stru
if (l3->shared) {
free_block(cachep, l3->shared->entry,
- l3->shared->avail);
+ l3->shared->avail, node);
kfree(l3->shared);
l3->shared = NULL;
}
@@ -1882,12 +1882,13 @@ static void do_drain(void *arg)
{
kmem_cache_t *cachep = (kmem_cache_t*)arg;
struct array_cache *ac;
+ int node = numa_node_id();
check_irq_off();
ac = ac_data(cachep);
- spin_lock(&cachep->nodelists[numa_node_id()]->list_lock);
- free_block(cachep, ac->entry, ac->avail);
- spin_unlock(&cachep->nodelists[numa_node_id()]->list_lock);
+ spin_lock(&cachep->nodelists[node]->list_lock);
+ free_block(cachep, ac->entry, ac->avail, node);
+ spin_unlock(&cachep->nodelists[node]->list_lock);
ac->avail = 0;
}
@@ -2608,7 +2609,7 @@ done:
/*
* Caller needs to acquire correct kmem_list's list_lock
*/
-static void free_block(kmem_cache_t *cachep, void **objpp, int nr_objects)
+static void free_block(kmem_cache_t *cachep, void **objpp, int nr_objects, int node)
{
int i;
struct kmem_list3 *l3;
@@ -2617,14 +2618,12 @@ static void free_block(kmem_cache_t *cac
void *objp = objpp[i];
struct slab *slabp;
unsigned int objnr;
- int nodeid = 0;
slabp = GET_PAGE_SLAB(virt_to_page(objp));
- nodeid = slabp->nodeid;
- l3 = cachep->nodelists[nodeid];
+ l3 = cachep->nodelists[node];
list_del(&slabp->list);
objnr = (objp - slabp->s_mem) / cachep->objsize;
- check_spinlock_acquired_node(cachep, nodeid);
+ check_spinlock_acquired_node(cachep, node);
check_slabp(cachep, slabp);
@@ -2664,13 +2663,14 @@ static void cache_flusharray(kmem_cache_
{
int batchcount;
struct kmem_list3 *l3;
+ int node = numa_node_id();
batchcount = ac->batchcount;
#if DEBUG
BUG_ON(!batchcount || batchcount > ac->avail);
#endif
check_irq_off();
- l3 = cachep->nodelists[numa_node_id()];
+ l3 = cachep->nodelists[node];
spin_lock(&l3->list_lock);
if (l3->shared) {
struct array_cache *shared_array = l3->shared;
@@ -2686,7 +2686,7 @@ static void cache_flusharray(kmem_cache_
}
}
- free_block(cachep, ac->entry, batchcount);
+ free_block(cachep, ac->entry, batchcount, node);
free_done:
#if STATS
{
@@ -2751,7 +2751,7 @@ static inline void __cache_free(kmem_cac
} else {
spin_lock(&(cachep->nodelists[nodeid])->
list_lock);
- free_block(cachep, &objp, 1);
+ free_block(cachep, &objp, 1, nodeid);
spin_unlock(&(cachep->nodelists[nodeid])->
list_lock);
}
@@ -2844,7 +2844,7 @@ void *kmem_cache_alloc_node(kmem_cache_t
unsigned long save_flags;
void *ptr;
- if (nodeid == numa_node_id() || nodeid == -1)
+ if (nodeid == -1)
return __cache_alloc(cachep, flags);
if (unlikely(!cachep->nodelists[nodeid])) {
@@ -3079,7 +3079,7 @@ static int alloc_kmemlist(kmem_cache_t *
if ((nc = cachep->nodelists[node]->shared))
free_block(cachep, nc->entry,
- nc->avail);
+ nc->avail, node);
l3->shared = new;
if (!cachep->nodelists[node]->alien) {
@@ -3160,7 +3160,7 @@ static int do_tune_cpucache(kmem_cache_t
if (!ccold)
continue;
spin_lock_irq(&cachep->nodelists[cpu_to_node(i)]->list_lock);
- free_block(cachep, ccold->entry, ccold->avail);
+ free_block(cachep, ccold->entry, ccold->avail, cpu_to_node(i));
spin_unlock_irq(&cachep->nodelists[cpu_to_node(i)]->list_lock);
kfree(ccold);
}
@@ -3240,7 +3240,7 @@ static void drain_array_locked(kmem_cach
if (tofree > ac->avail) {
tofree = (ac->avail+1)/2;
}
- free_block(cachep, ac->entry, tofree);
+ free_block(cachep, ac->entry, tofree, node);
ac->avail -= tofree;
memmove(ac->entry, &(ac->entry[tofree]),
sizeof(void*)*ac->avail);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-22 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-15 16:51 Petr Vandrovec
2005-09-15 17:33 ` Petr Vandrovec
[not found] ` <20050916023005.4146e499.akpm@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <432AA00D.4030706@vc.cvut.cz>
[not found] ` <20050916230809.789d6b0b.akpm@osdl.org>
2005-09-19 16:02 ` Petr Vandrovec
2005-09-19 18:29 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-19 18:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-19 19:28 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-19 21:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-20 5:16 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-20 8:34 ` Alok Kataria
2005-09-20 13:58 ` Petr Vandrovec
2005-09-21 1:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-21 1:22 ` Petr Vandrovec
2005-09-21 15:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-22 19:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-22 20:01 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-09-22 21:25 ` Petr Vandrovec
2005-09-22 21:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-22 21:46 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-22 21:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-23 0:25 ` Petr Vandrovec
2005-09-28 21:02 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-09-28 22:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-29 16:43 ` Petr Vandrovec
2005-09-29 18:11 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-09-29 18:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-30 5:45 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-09-30 6:05 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-30 6:28 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-09-30 15:16 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2005-09-30 15:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-30 16:45 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2005-09-30 20:11 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-30 20:23 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-09-30 16:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-19 18:56 ` Petr Vandrovec
2005-09-19 19:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-23 19:34 Alok Kataria
2005-09-23 23:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-24 0:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-24 12:52 ` Manfred Spraul
2005-09-25 14:16 Alok Kataria
2005-09-26 18:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-26 19:34 ` Alok Kataria
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050922130150.0822b882.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alokk@calsoftinc.com \
--cc=clameter@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=vandrove@vc.cvut.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®