From: Michael Bellion <mbellion@hipac.org>
To: hadi@cyberus.ca
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release of nf-HiPAC 0.9.0
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 15:16:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200509261516.16565.mbellion@hipac.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1127733492.6215.274.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Hi,
> Can you post some numbers relative to iptables?
We have some performance tests available at:
http://www.hipac.org/performance_tests/overview.html
We also have a list of the independent performance tests we know of:
http://www.hipac.org/performance_tests/independent.html
> Some tests with the following parameters would be helpful:
> - Variable incoming packet rate (in packets per second)
> - Variable packet sizes
> - Variable number of users/filters
> - Effect of adding/removing/modifying policies while under different
> incoming traffic rates.
Most of this parameters are used in the performance tests above.
The effect of adding/removing/modifying policies while under different
incoming traffic rates has not been tested in the above tests.
nf-HiPAC is based on a completely dynamic approach.
This means that the algorithm used in HiPAC makes sure that the lookup data
structure is not rebuild from scratch again as soon as you make a update of
the data structure.
Instead during an update of the policies only the required changes of the
lookup data structure are made. This guaranties that the packet processing is
only affected to the least possible amount during updates.
It would certainly be nice to see some benchmark results for this case.
nf-HiPAC is expected to handle this very well, because it was designed with
this case in mind.
Regards
+---------------------------+
| Michael Bellion |
| <mbellion@hipac.org> |
+---------------------------+
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-26 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-26 2:45 Michael Bellion
2005-09-26 11:18 ` jamal
2005-09-26 13:16 ` Michael Bellion [this message]
2005-09-26 13:31 ` jamal
2005-09-26 11:24 ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-09-26 11:58 ` jamal
2005-09-26 12:13 ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-09-26 12:40 ` jamal
2005-09-26 14:38 ` Michael Bellion
2005-09-26 15:05 ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-09-26 16:03 ` Michael Bellion
2005-09-26 16:31 ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-09-30 12:33 ` Harald Welte
2005-10-01 15:38 ` Michael Bellion
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200509261516.16565.mbellion@hipac.org \
--to=mbellion@hipac.org \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®