From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932091AbVI2K6W (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Sep 2005 06:58:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932095AbVI2K6W (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Sep 2005 06:58:22 -0400 Received: from anf141.internetdsl.tpnet.pl ([83.17.87.141]:2012 "EHLO anf141.internetdsl.tpnet.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932091AbVI2K6V (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Sep 2005 06:58:21 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: "Siddha, Suresh B" Subject: Re: [PATCH][Fix][Resend] Fix Bug #4959: Page tables corrupted during resume on x86-64 (take 3) Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 12:58:42 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: Andi Kleen , Pavel Machek , Andrew Morton , LKML , discuss@x86-64.org References: <200509281624.29256.rjw@sisk.pl> <200509282224.43397.rjw@sisk.pl> <20050928170031.D30088@unix-os.sc.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20050928170031.D30088@unix-os.sc.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509291258.43258.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thursday, 29 of September 2005 02:00, Siddha, Suresh B wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 10:24:42PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wednesday, 28 of September 2005 21:18, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > Also Suresh S. has a patch out to turn the initial page tables > > > into initdata. It'll probably conflict with that. Needs to be coordinated > > > with him. > > > > Do you mean the patch at: > > http://www.x86-64.org/lists/discuss/msg07297.html ? > > Unfortunately it interferes with the current swsusp code, which uses > > init_level4_pgt anyway. > > > > Could we please treat my patch as a (very much needed) urgent bugfix > > and make the whole swsusp code in line with the Suresh's patch later on? > > > > Suresh, could you please say what you think of it? > > My patch as such shouldn't change the behavior of the existing swsup > code. I am making only boot_level4_pgt as initdata. But not the > init_level4_pgt. Then it should not conflict with my patch either, because I'm only referring to init_level4_pgt. Greetings, Rafael