From: Alexander Clouter <alex@digriz.org.uk>
To: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] cpufreq_conservative: invert meaning of 'ignore_nice'
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:09:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050930080926.GA3033@inskipp.digriz.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200509291346.33855.blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1662 bytes --]
Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> [20050929 13:46:33 +0200]:
>
> On Thursday 29 September 2005 10:44, Alexander Clouter wrote:
>
> > WARNING: this obvious breaks any userland tools that expect things to be
> > the other way round. This patch clears up the confusion but should go in
> > ASAP as at the moment it seems very few tools even make use of this
> > functionality; all I could find was a Gentoo Wiki entry.
>
> My suggestion on this is to rename the flag too, as ignore_nice_load (or
> ignore_nice_tasks, choose your way). Don't forget to do it in docs too.
>
'ignore_nice_tasks' gets my vote..
> So userspace tools will error out rather than do the reverse of what they were
> doing, and the user will fix the thing according to the (new) docs.
>
> This is the way we avoid problems in kernel code, when changing APIs (I read
> Linus talking about this), so I assume it's ok?
>
Makes a lot of sense. I'll roll out some new patches this evening and submit
them.
Regards
Alex
> --
> Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
> Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
> http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________
> Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
> http://mail.yahoo.it
--
________________________________________
< An idle mind is worth two in the bush. >
----------------------------------------
\ ^__^
\ (oo)\_______
(__)\ )\/\
||----w |
|| ||
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-30 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-29 8:44 Alexander Clouter
2005-09-29 11:46 ` Blaisorblade
2005-09-29 21:51 ` Dave Jones
2005-09-30 13:56 ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-09-30 8:09 ` Alexander Clouter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050930080926.GA3033@inskipp.digriz.org.uk \
--to=alex@digriz.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome