From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750941AbVJBB0Z (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Oct 2005 21:26:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750938AbVJBB0Z (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Oct 2005 21:26:25 -0400 Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:23979 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750936AbVJBB0Y (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Oct 2005 21:26:24 -0400 Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 18:26:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20051001.182620.32883151.davem@davemloft.net> To: bunk@stusta.de Cc: wli@holomorphy.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] sparc: "extern inline" -> "static inline" From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20051001230628.GF4212@stusta.de> References: <20050902202444.GS3657@stusta.de> <20050902.132754.118393946.davem@davemloft.net> <20051001230628.GF4212@stusta.de> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2.53 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Adrian Bunk Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 01:06:28 +0200 > I just tried 2.6.14-rc3 and 2.6.14-rc2-mm2, and it applied against both. 'patch' and friends are much more lenient about white space and other types of "fuzz" than the git patch application code is. So that can often be the reason. But this version applies properly, thanks a lot Adrian.