From: "Rogério Brito" <rbrito@ime.usp.br>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Cc: Grzegorz Kulewski <kangur@polcom.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Strange disk corruption with Linux >= 2.6.13
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 18:15:43 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051001211543.GB6397@ime.usp.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0509272139220.18464@poirot.grange>
Hi, Guennadi.
On Sep 27 2005, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Version B here. It first had only 128MB, worked fine, I added 256MB,
> system become unstable, memtest86 found "bad memory" around the last
> megabytes.
This is *quite* similar to what I am seeing.
> Then I bought 512MB, hoping to use it with 256MB - no way.
Again, similar to what I see.
> Every module alone works, but not together. But in my case memtest86
> did find errors.
This is something puzzling: when I first installed the modules to get
1.25GB, things "worked", but I had problems with memtest86+ (not
memtest86).
I changed things (removing modules), got frustrated having only 512MB on
the system with all the other modules laying around here and put them
back.
This second time, I reduced the latency on the BIOS from 2-2-2 to 3-3-3
and it booted and memtest86+ did't find any errors. Yet, I saw some
corruption, which was what prompted me to send the original mail to
linux-kernel (since I didn't know if it was a hardware or a software
problem, as memtest86+ had not found any errors).
> Try removing the 256MB module?...
Right now, I'm only using one 512MB module, but after I have already
paid for the second one, and it wasn't cheap. :-(
I suspect that the system is stable now, but I am not sure. If I
reinstall some packages with apt, it still gets some problems with the
md5sum signatures of *other* packages, which is highly weird. But I
don't see any other problems.
Puzzling, huh? I already run a SMART offline/long self-test on the disk
(to rule out it being a problem) and it passed with flying colors. I
also already used badblocks on this very disk (but in read-only mode),
and it also didn't find any problems.
I have a Quantum FIREBALLlct15 drive here.
Thanks,
--
Rogério Brito : rbrito@ime.usp.br : http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito
Homepage of the algorithms package : http://algorithms.berlios.de
Homepage on freshmeat: http://freshmeat.net/projects/algorithms/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-01 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-27 11:10 Rogério Brito
2005-09-27 11:34 ` Diego Calleja
2005-09-27 11:58 ` Rogério Brito
2005-09-27 12:10 ` Rogério Brito
2005-09-27 11:57 ` Grant Coady
2005-09-27 12:43 ` Ondrej Zary
2005-10-01 21:22 ` Rogério Brito
2005-09-27 14:04 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-10-01 21:28 ` Rogério Brito
2005-10-03 16:20 ` Lennart Sorensen
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.63.0509271331590.21130@alpha.polcom.net>
2005-09-27 12:20 ` Rogério Brito
2005-09-27 12:38 ` Grzegorz Kulewski
2005-09-27 19:42 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2005-09-27 21:01 ` Erik Mouw
2005-09-27 21:44 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2005-10-01 21:15 ` Rogério Brito [this message]
2005-10-08 22:35 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2005-10-09 9:30 ` Rogério Brito
2005-10-01 21:02 ` Rogério Brito
2005-09-27 23:31 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-10-01 21:36 ` Rogério Brito
2005-10-02 0:06 ` Grant Coady
2005-10-03 4:17 ` Rogério Brito
2005-10-03 4:20 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-10-03 4:55 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-10-04 10:28 ` Sander
2005-10-04 12:42 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-09-28 8:43 ` Ville Herva
2005-09-28 23:23 ` Alan Cox
2005-09-29 6:29 ` Ville Herva
2005-09-29 16:14 ` Alan Cox
2005-10-03 5:05 ` Rogério Brito
2005-10-03 5:15 ` Rogério Brito
[not found] <4RlFC-2ev-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4Rxdq-2Tc-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4SXfs-7hM-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-10-02 3:37 ` Bodo Eggert
2005-10-03 4:30 ` Rogério Brito
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051001211543.GB6397@ime.usp.br \
--to=rbrito@ime.usp.br \
--cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=kangur@polcom.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome