From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
vatsa@in.ibm.com, rusty@au1.ibm.com, mingo@elte.hu,
manfred@colorfullife.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RCU torture testing
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 07:30:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051003143009.GB1300@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051002210549.GA8503@elf.ucw.cz>
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 11:05:49PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > The attached patch adds CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST, which enables a /proc-based
> > intense torture test of the RCU infrastructure. This is needed due to the
> > continued changes to RCU infrastructure to accommodate dynamic ticks, CPU
> > hotplug, and so on. Most of the code is in a separate file that is compiled
> > only if the CONFIG variable is set. Documentation on how to run the test
> > and interpret the output is also included.
> >
> > This code has been tested on i386 and ppc64, and an earlier version of the
> > code has seen extensive testing on a number of architectures as part of the
> > PREEMPT_RT patchset.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
>
> Can you just run the tests from time to time inside IBM?
In principle, I could, but in practice it is appropriate for non-IBMers to
be able to test the RCU infrastructure easily and thoroughly when they
work on it.
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-03 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-01 18:20 Paul E. McKenney
2005-10-02 0:11 ` Greg KH
2005-10-03 14:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-10-03 14:48 ` Greg KH
2005-10-02 21:05 ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-03 6:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-03 14:30 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2005-10-03 14:36 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-10-03 15:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-10-03 15:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-10-03 15:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-10-22 23:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051003143009.GB1300@us.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rusty@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome