From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030230AbVJEQlu (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2005 12:41:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030233AbVJEQlu (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2005 12:41:50 -0400 Received: from S010600c0f014b14a.ss.shawcable.net ([70.64.60.7]:24076 "HELO discworld.dyndns.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1030230AbVJEQlt (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2005 12:41:49 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 10:41:45 -0600 From: Charles Cazabon To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Why is this list using Majordomo? Message-ID: <20051005164145.GB29214@discworld.dyndns.org> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <4343FEDF.3020002@perkel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4343FEDF.3020002@perkel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Marc Perkel wrote: > Instead of a smarter more modern list software package like Mailman? First you say the Linux kernel is "laughable" and should copy Netware instead. Now you say the (existing, working) list manager is no good, without saying why. Are you a troll? Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon GPL'ed software available at: http://pyropus.ca/software/ -----------------------------------------------------------------------