From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] add sysfs to dynamically control blk request tag maintenance
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 09:23:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051007072328.GO2889@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200510070246.j972kig22629@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
On Thu, Oct 06 2005, Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
> blk_queue_start_tag and blk_queue_end_tag are called for tagging
> I/O to scsi device that is capable of tcq. blk_queue_find_tag is
> a function that utilizes the tag information built up on every I/O.
>
> However, there aren't many consumers for blk_queue_find_tag, except
> NCR53c700 and tekram-dc390. Vast majority of scsi drivers don't
> use these tag currently. So why bother build them at the beginning
> of an I/O and then tear it all down at the end, all doing hard work
> but no other functions in the kernel appears to care.
>
> Is there another big scheme in the works to use these tags? If not,
> I'd like to propose we add a sysfs attribute to dynamically control
> whether kernel maintains blk request tag or not. This has performance
> advantage that we don't needlessly waste CPU cycle on things we throw
> away without using them. Would the following patch be acceptable?
> Comments?
I don't understand the need for this patch - the generic tagging is only
used if the SCSI LLD indicated it wanted it by issuing a
scsi_activate_tcq(). So blk_queue_start_tag() is only called if the LLD
already did a scsi_activate_tcq(), and blk_queue_end_tag() is only
called if the rq is block layer tagged. blk_queue_find_tag() is only
used with direct use of scsi_find_tag(), a function that should (and is)
only usable by users of the generic tagging already.
So please, a description of what problem you are trying to solve would
be appreciated :-)
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-07 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-07 2:46 Chen, Kenneth W
2005-10-07 7:23 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2005-10-07 7:35 Chen, Kenneth W
2005-10-07 7:41 ` Jens Axboe
2005-10-07 7:50 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-10-07 8:06 ` Jens Axboe
2005-10-07 8:25 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-10-07 7:52 Chen, Kenneth W
2005-10-07 8:07 ` Jens Axboe
2005-10-07 8:04 Chen, Kenneth W
2005-10-07 8:13 Chen, Kenneth W
2005-10-07 16:57 ` Andrew Vasquez
2005-10-07 18:17 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051007072328.GO2889@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome