From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932545AbVJGNWa (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2005 09:22:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932547AbVJGNWa (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2005 09:22:30 -0400 Received: from web30515.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.201.243]:12131 "HELO web30515.mail.mud.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932545AbVJGNWa (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2005 09:22:30 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=mQTa7hjSUIDzdFMUOD/ueixv3mDjG0xkHKWRqrliXeFRUAgxPIyz3RRzUznJgyRsWo6rz9JXjHNPMOvU+nVRvZp7lFpLeWuYktegdNncrFsH5iUoIVQNy4twyEfINetScTwPJTop5G5yLMgToUAbxDgPjsJgb+fuiQuVcjXRJJM= ; Message-ID: <20051007132227.15252.qmail@web30515.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 09:22:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Arthur Cosma Subject: Re: Any news on PATA support for Promise PDC 20375? To: Daniel Drake Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik In-Reply-To: <4342AF23.6000907@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Daniel, Thank you very much for taking the time to reply to my inquiry. Although I didn't get the attachment, I won't bother you to re-send, I will try to find it in the Gentoo kernel. If that fails, I will wait for a release. Best regards, Arthur --- Daniel Drake wrote: > Arthur Cosma wrote: > > Please CC me only any reply to this message, as I > am not a mailing list > > subscriber. > > > > This was my last resort, as all searches on the > subject topic yield > > messages from 2004, many of which mention Jeff > Garzik's name. > > > > After trying 2.6.13.2, I still don't get the PATA > drives recognized, so I > > believe it's still not there yet. > > > > The question is, will it ever be, or has it been > dropped? > > I'm attaching the patch included in Gentoo's 2.6.13 > kernels, which originally > came from Jeff's repo. > > I asked Jeff about this patch previously, and his > comment was: > > > However, this patch in particular is safe and OK > -- it just needs cleaning > > up before including in 2.6.13, and I haven't > figured out how to clean it up > > yet. The port_flags[] array this patch adds is a > hack. > > > > I need to separate the port settings from the host > settings, which would be > > the proper fix. > > So I guess the answer is just wait a while longer > (and patch manually for now) :) > > Daniel > __________________________________________________________ Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca