Re: [PATCH 1/1] indirect function calls elimination in IO scheduler

["Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>]

On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:12:18 +0400 Ananiev, Leonid I wrote:

> Randy,
> You are right. The lines is broken if I send patch outside Intel (I've
> tried to send @mail.ru)
> Inside Intel the lines are not broken as I see in response mails.
> I've used 'Plain text" before but flag "Use MS Word 2003 to edit e-mail
> massages" was not turned off.
> Now this flag is turned off. Once more I had opened using WordPad the
> diff-text created on Linux and have pasted it in this mail.
> Is it OK in your mail client?

No:

patch: **** malformed patch at line 52: *rq)

Fix one, try again:

patch: **** malformed patch at line 79: *rq)

again:

patch: **** malformed patch at line 175: *rq)

again:
patch: **** malformed patch at line 247: *cfqq)

In general:  copy-paste often has problems in Linux.  I don't
know about in Windows.

In general:  you might be better off trying to use attachments.


> But I've send long patch line to @mail.ru and I've seen the lines still
> broken.
> It is not permitted to use mail client other than MS Outlook in our
> office.

That needs to be fixed.  There are some decent email clients for
Windows, like Netscape/Mozilla, Thunderbird, sylpheed (beta),
even Eudora.

> Randy writes
> >You should also make sure that it applies cleanly
> > to the current kernel version
> 
> I've applied it to linux-2.6.14-rc4
> ----------------------------------------------------

---
~Randy