From: Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/20] inflate: (arch) kill silly zlib typedefs
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 09:57:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051101085740.GR22601@alpha.home.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0511010850190.2739@numbat.sonytel.be>
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 08:50:43AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > But if it's a pointer why don't you declare them unsigned long then ?
> > C defines the long as the integer the right size to store a pointer.
> ^
> Is it C?
Yes, that's what I read quite a time ago, and it appears that it was an
interpretation of the spec which is not true anymore with LLP64 models :-(
> Since on Wintendo P64 it's not true...
I don't know if x86_64 is LP64 or LLP64 on Linux, but at least my alpha
and sparc64 are LP64, so is another PPC64 I use for code validation.
LPC64 is the recommended model for easier 32 to 64 portability (where
ints are 32 ; long, longlong, ptrs are 64).
There's an interesting reading about this here :
http://www.usenix.org/publications/login/standards/10.data.html
So Matt, you have to use void* or char* in your types.
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
Thanks Geert for the notification, it was an opportunity to refresh my
thoughts about portability practices. I think it will be time to buy
an x86_64 :-/
Willy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-01 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-31 20:54 [PATCH 1/20] inflate: lindent and manual formatting changes Matt Mackall
2005-10-31 20:54 ` [PATCH 2/20] inflate: kill legacy bits Matt Mackall
2005-10-31 20:54 ` [PATCH 3/20] inflate: clean up input logic Matt Mackall
2005-10-31 20:54 ` [PATCH 4/20] inflate: start moving globals into iostate Matt Mackall
2005-10-31 20:54 ` [PATCH 5/20] inflate: cleanup Huffman table code Matt Mackall
2005-10-31 20:54 ` [PATCH 6/20] inflate: internalize CRC calculation, cleanup table calculation Matt Mackall
2005-10-31 20:54 ` [PATCH 7/20] inflate: eliminate memzero usage Matt Mackall
2005-10-31 20:54 ` [PATCH 8/20] inflate: (arch) kill unneeded declarations Matt Mackall
2005-10-31 20:54 ` [PATCH 9/20] inflate: (arch) refactor inflate malloc code Matt Mackall
2005-10-31 20:54 ` [PATCH 10/20] inflate: (arch) kill external CRC calculation Matt Mackall
2005-10-31 20:54 ` [PATCH 11/20] inflate: (arch) kill get_byte Matt Mackall
2005-10-31 20:54 ` [PATCH 12/20] inflate: internalize (arch) most of the output window handling Matt Mackall
2005-10-31 20:54 ` [PATCH 13/20] inflate: (arch) kill silly zlib typedefs Matt Mackall
2005-10-31 20:54 ` [PATCH 14/20] inflate: (arch) use an error callback rather than a global Matt Mackall
2005-10-31 20:54 ` [PATCH 15/20] inflate: (arch) tidy user declarations Matt Mackall
2005-10-31 20:54 ` [PATCH 16/20] inflate: remove legacy DEBG macros Matt Mackall
2005-10-31 20:54 ` [PATCH 17/20] inflate: mark some arrays as initdata Matt Mackall
2005-10-31 20:54 ` [PATCH 18/20] inflate: minor const changes Matt Mackall
2005-10-31 20:54 ` [PATCH 19/20] inflate: (arch) use proper linking Matt Mackall
2005-10-31 20:54 ` [PATCH 20/20] inflate: make in-core inflate share common CRC Matt Mackall
2005-10-31 22:45 ` [PATCH 19/20] inflate: (arch) use proper linking Russell King
2005-10-31 23:02 ` Matt Mackall
2005-10-31 23:13 ` Russell King
2005-10-31 22:43 ` [PATCH 17/20] inflate: mark some arrays as initdata Russell King
2005-10-31 22:57 ` Matt Mackall
2005-10-31 23:10 ` Russell King
2005-10-31 23:11 ` Matt Mackall
2005-10-31 23:36 ` Russell King
2005-10-31 21:05 ` [PATCH 13/20] inflate: (arch) kill silly zlib typedefs Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-10-31 21:14 ` Matt Mackall
2005-11-01 6:53 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-11-01 7:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-11-01 8:57 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2005-11-01 11:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-11-08 6:05 ` Miles Bader
2005-11-08 6:18 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-11-01 0:24 ` [PATCH 1/20] inflate: lindent and manual formatting changes Paul Mackerras
2005-11-01 1:39 ` Matt Mackall
2005-11-01 7:50 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-01 18:28 ` Oops! Forgot [PATCH 0/20] inflate cleanups Matt Mackall
2005-12-22 18:26 [PATCH 12/20] inflate: internalize (arch) most of the output window handling Matt Mackall
2005-12-22 18:26 ` [PATCH 13/20] inflate: (arch) kill silly zlib typedefs Matt Mackall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051101085740.GR22601@alpha.home.local \
--to=willy@w.ods.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome