From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.14-rc5-rt6 -- False NMI lockup detects
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 12:33:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051101113304.GB2871@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1130250219.21118.11.camel@localhost.localdomain>
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> Hi Ingo and Thomas,
>
> On some of my machines, I've been experiencing false NMI lockups.
> This usually happens on slower machines, and taking a look into this,
> it seems to be due to a short time where no processes are using
> timers, and the ktimer interrupts aren't needed. So the APIC timer,
> which now is used only for the ktimers, has a five second pause, and
> causes the NMI to go off. The NMI uses the apic timer to determine
> lockups.
>
> So, I added a more generic method. This only works for x86 for now,
> but it has a #ifdef to keep other archs working until it implements
> this as well. I added a nmi_irq_incr which is called by __do_IRQ in
> the generic code. This is what is used in the NMI code to determine
> if the CPU has locked up. This way we don't have to worry about what
> resource we are using for timers.
but e.g. the APIC timer doesnt go through do_IRQ(), it has its own
special IRQ entry code. The simple solution would be to also include the
IRQ#0 count in the NMI watchdog detection condition - i.e. something
like the patch below. Hm?
Ingo
Index: linux/arch/i386/kernel/nmi.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/i386/kernel/nmi.c
+++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/nmi.c
@@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ void notrace nmi_watchdog_tick (struct p
*/
int sum, cpu = smp_processor_id();
- sum = per_cpu(irq_stat, cpu).apic_timer_irqs;
+ sum = per_cpu(irq_stat, cpu).apic_timer_irqs + kstat_irqs(0);
profile_tick(CPU_PROFILING, regs);
if (nmi_show_regs[cpu]) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-01 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-25 14:23 Steven Rostedt
2005-10-25 14:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-25 19:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-25 19:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-10-25 20:00 ` George Anzinger
2005-10-25 20:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-26 11:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-11-01 11:33 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2005-11-01 17:41 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051101113304.GB2871@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®