From: Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@zmailer.org>
To: Andreas Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Marc Perkel <marc@perkel.com>,
Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@zmailer.org>,
Michael Madore <michael.madore@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acurrid@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: PCI-DMA: high address but no IOMMU - nForce4
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:35:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051106123512.GG3423@mea-ext.zmailer.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6079139.1130945900155.SLOX.WebMail.wwwrun@imap-dhs.suse.de>
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 04:38:20PM +0100, Andreas Kleen wrote:
> Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 16:38:20 +0100 (CET)
> From: Andreas Kleen <ak@suse.de>
> To: Marc Perkel <marc@perkel.com>
> Subject: Re: PCI-DMA: high address but no IOMMU - nForce4
>
> [full quote]
[severe clipping]
> Am Di 01.11.2005 06:21 schrieb Marc Perkel <marc@perkel.com>:
>
> > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 12:16:51AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >
> > > I will attach my own; A brand new Amd64 dual-core thing.
> > > Works fine with mem=2500M, but blows up with mem=3G or
> > > without any override and full 4G complement in use.
> > >
> > > This board (ASUS A8N-SLI) does use NVIDIA nForce4 chipset with
> > > bios-option to map (hoist) "excess memory" out from first 4G to
> > > higher physical addresses so that it can be accessed by the
> > > processor.
> > >
> > > This board has no AGP at all in it, but it does have lots
> > > of PCIE, and a bit of PCI-X thrown in for "legacy cards".
> > > Somehow that detail breaks things when the machine really
> > > should use bounce-buffering, or something similar -- I don't
> > > know if Nvidia nForce4 chipset does have IOMMU, though...
> >
> > For what it's worth I have almost the exact same hardware and got the
> > same
> > error. Athlon X2 4400 with the same ASUS board. Reverting to 2.6.13.2
> > kernel works.
>
> This sounds like the PCI-X BIOS misconfiguration issue that Andy C.
> recently tracked down. Andy do you agree?
>
> If yes it's a BIOS problem, but we can probably work around it with a
> quirk.
>
> -Andi
Well.. sort of. Thinking goes probably like this:
"The GART is AGP thingie, it shall be initialized minimally
or not at all in a system that has no AGP."
which naturally backfires, when indeed all IO bus things will
use GART, not only AGP..
I am using Fedora Core development kernels for x86_64, and am able
to get system to work (mostly) with all 4 GB of memory by using
following boot parameters:
iommu=soft swiotlb=65536
with all of 2.6.14 series kernel versions for past week (or two).
I did try some other options as well, like:
iommu=noagp,force,memaper=3
but that didn't succeed in booting my box all the way, and always
in the end crashing with the message in $SUBJECT, above.
Plain 2.4.14 works completely with mem=2600M boot-option, but
it does still tell:
Checking aperture...
CPU 0: aperture @ 0 size 32 MB
No AGP bridge found
and somewhere (AMD documents?) I spotted a mention that having
aperture overlaying memory is "a bad idea", thus when memory
starts at zero, and aperture starts there...
A quirk, very least.
There is separate issue with recent change in mm/memory.c
contained get_user_pages() function (?) that fail my
BTTV card access -- and I might be wrong again, I did
suspect I2C at first, but strace shows fault to happen with
VIDIOC_QBUF ioctl...
/Matti Aarnio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-06 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-27 17:47 PCI-DMA: high address but no IOMMU Michael Madore
2005-10-27 17:57 ` Nish Aravamudan
2005-10-27 22:16 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-27 22:39 ` Michael Madore
2005-10-28 1:59 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-10-30 14:29 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-10-30 14:59 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-30 21:26 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-10-30 0:27 ` PCI-DMA: high address but no IOMMU - nForce4 Matti Aarnio
2005-11-01 5:21 ` Marc Perkel
2005-11-02 15:38 ` Andreas Kleen
2005-11-06 12:35 ` Matti Aarnio [this message]
2005-11-01 16:35 ` Marc Perkel
2005-12-18 20:07 ` PCI-DMA: high address but no IOMMU (still there) Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
2005-10-31 17:50 PCI-DMA: high address but no IOMMU - nForce4 Allen Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051106123512.GG3423@mea-ext.zmailer.org \
--to=matti.aarnio@zmailer.org \
--cc=acurrid@nvidia.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc@perkel.com \
--cc=michael.madore@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®