From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965355AbVKHD2K (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2005 22:28:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932409AbVKHD2J (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2005 22:28:09 -0500 Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:40069 "HELO xenotime.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932403AbVKHD2I (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2005 22:28:08 -0500 Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:12:58 -0800 From: "Randy.Dunlap" To: Neil Brown Cc: viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linuxram@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [OT] Re: [PATCH 3/18] allow callers of seq_open do allocation themselves Message-Id: <20051107191258.1104b731.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: <17264.6769.472245.973213@cse.unsw.edu.au> References: <20051107190340.129bc8c3.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <17264.6769.472245.973213@cse.unsw.edu.au> Organization: YPO4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:24:33 +1100 Neil Brown wrote: > On Monday November 7, rdunlap@xenotime.net wrote: > > On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 02:01:31 +0000 Al Viro wrote: > > > > > From: Al Viro > > > Date: 1131401734 -0500 > > > > What format is that date in, please? > > > > %s %z > > (as date(1) understands it). Thanks. I sorta guessed that after I sent the mail. > Or was this a rhetorical question, meaning to say "Who in their right > mind would used that sort of date format on a public mailing list?" :-) nope 8:) --- ~Randy