From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
davej@redhat.com, thang@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild updates
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 00:02:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051107230243.GC10492@mars.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0511071102380.12843@scrub.home>
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 11:13:16AM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 6 Nov 2005, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 01:44:32PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
> > >
> > > What exactly is the problem? How does Fedora use QTLIB?
> >
> > See:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137926
>
> I'm not really happy with this patch. I don't really like relying on
> QTLIB, it's a really ugly hack.
I've forwarded your mail to Than Ngo (email was wrong in my origianl
mail). As the original patch author I like him to comment/test.
Sam
> If the nonextisting ../lib64 dir is the problem, I'd more prefer a patch
> like this:
>
> Index: linux-2.6/scripts/kconfig/Makefile
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/scripts/kconfig/Makefile 2005-11-06 00:27:29.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6/scripts/kconfig/Makefile 2005-11-07 11:08:58.000000000 +0100
> @@ -162,9 +164,10 @@ $(obj)/.tmp_qtcheck:
> echo "*"; \
> false; \
> fi; \
> - LIBPATH=$$DIR/lib; LIB=qt; \
> + LIBPATH=$$DIR/lib; LIB=qt; osdir=""; \
> $(HOSTCXX) -print-multi-os-directory > /dev/null 2>&1 && \
> - LIBPATH=$$DIR/lib/$$($(HOSTCXX) -print-multi-os-directory); \
> + osdir=$$($(HOSTCXX) -print-multi-os-directory); \
Common practice is to use $(shell $(HOSTCXX) -print-multi-os-directory)
It's more obvious what you achive.
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-07 23:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-06 10:18 Sam Ravnborg
2005-11-06 12:44 ` Roman Zippel
2005-11-06 13:21 ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-11-07 10:13 ` Roman Zippel
2005-11-07 23:02 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2005-11-10 20:52 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051107230243.GC10492@mars.ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=thang@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®