From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030385AbVKHW5J (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:57:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965285AbVKHW5J (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:57:09 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:29074 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965211AbVKHW5I (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:57:08 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:56:56 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: "Jan Beulich" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] minor ELF addition Message-Id: <20051108145656.06e0d2b8.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <4370AE20.76F0.0078.0@novell.com> References: <4370AE20.76F0.0078.0@novell.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Jan Beulich" wrote: > > A trivial addition to the ELF definitions. > > ... > #define STT_FILE 4 > +#define STT_COMMON 5 > +#define STT_TLS 6 Is there any particular reason for adding these, or is it just a completeness thing?