From: Alexander Clouter <alex@digriz.org.uk>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davej@redhat.com,
davej@codemonkey.org.uk, blaisorblade@yahoo.it
Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] cpufreq_conservative/ondemand: invert meaning of 'ignore nice'
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:54:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051110155412.GC16994@inskipp.digriz.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200511110248.58751.kernel@kolivas.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 984 bytes --]
Con,
Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> [20051111 02:48:57 +1100]:
>
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 02:11, Alexander Clouter wrote:
> > The use of the 'ignore_nice' sysfs file is confusing to anyone using it.
> > This removes the sysfs file 'ignore_nice' and in its place creates a
> > 'ignore_nice_load' entry which defaults to '1'; meaning nice'd processes
> > are not counted towards the 'business' caclulation.
>
> And just for the last time I'll argue that the default should be 0. I have yet
> to discuss this with any laptop user who thinks that 1 is the correct default
> for ondemand.
>
....resubmitting with alternative defaults....
Cheers
Alex
> Regards,
> Con
--
____________________________________
/ "An ounce of prevention is worth a \
\ pound of purge." /
------------------------------------
\ ^__^
\ (oo)\_______
(__)\ )\/\
||----w |
|| ||
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-10 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-10 15:11 Alexander Clouter
2005-11-10 15:48 ` Con Kolivas
2005-11-10 15:54 ` Alexander Clouter [this message]
2005-11-13 19:59 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-18 12:07 ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-11-21 15:29 ` Dave Jones
2005-11-10 17:00 Alexander Clouter
2005-11-10 23:12 ` Con Kolivas
2005-11-11 9:09 ` Alexander Clouter
2005-11-12 3:30 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2005-11-21 18:17 Alexander Clouter
2005-11-22 1:21 ` Ken Moffat
2005-11-22 2:22 ` Dave Jones
2005-11-22 2:31 ` Con Kolivas
2005-11-22 11:43 ` Ken Moffat
2005-11-22 8:52 ` Alexander Clouter
2005-11-22 11:38 ` Ken Moffat
2005-11-23 9:46 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051110155412.GC16994@inskipp.digriz.org.uk \
--to=alex@digriz.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome