From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932114AbVKJUyI (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:54:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932116AbVKJUyI (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:54:08 -0500 Received: from pfepa.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.235]:32798 "EHLO pfepa.post.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932114AbVKJUyH (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:54:07 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:52:35 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Roman Zippel Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , davej@redhat.com, than@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Russell King Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild updates Message-ID: <20051110205235.GA7584@mars.ravnborg.org> References: <20051106101844.GA11921@mars.ravnborg.org> <20051106132111.GA9042@mars.ravnborg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 11:13:16AM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 6 Nov 2005, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 01:44:32PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote: > > > > > > What exactly is the problem? How does Fedora use QTLIB? > > > > See: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137926 > > I'm not really happy with this patch. I don't really like relying on > QTLIB, it's a really ugly hack. > If the nonextisting ../lib64 dir is the problem, I'd more prefer a patch > like this: Hi Roman. Than confirmed in private mail that this fixes the problem he saw. Can you either send me a properly Signed-off-by: patch or send the patch to Linus yourself. [I got Than' mailaddress wrong in my initial mial ::-(] thanks, Sam