From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: axboe@suse.de, jgarzik@pobox.com, James.Bottomley@steeleye.com,
bzolnier@gmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-2.6-block:post-2.6.15 02/10] blk: separate out bio init part from __make_request
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 00:36:21 +0900 (KST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051117153509.09EEAC11@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051117153509.B89B4777@htj.dyndns.org>
02_blk_implement-init_request_from_bio.patch
Separate out bio initialization part from __make_request. It
will be used by the following blk_ordered_reimpl.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
ll_rw_blk.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
Index: work/block/ll_rw_blk.c
===================================================================
--- work.orig/block/ll_rw_blk.c 2005-11-18 00:35:04.000000000 +0900
+++ work/block/ll_rw_blk.c 2005-11-18 00:35:05.000000000 +0900
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@
static void blk_unplug_work(void *data);
static void blk_unplug_timeout(unsigned long data);
static void drive_stat_acct(struct request *rq, int nr_sectors, int new_io);
+static void init_request_from_bio(struct request *req, struct bio *bio);
+static int __make_request(request_queue_t *q, struct bio *bio);
/*
* For the allocated request tables
@@ -1651,8 +1653,6 @@ static int blk_init_free_list(request_qu
return 0;
}
-static int __make_request(request_queue_t *, struct bio *);
-
request_queue_t *blk_alloc_queue(gfp_t gfp_mask)
{
return blk_alloc_queue_node(gfp_mask, -1);
@@ -2639,6 +2639,36 @@ void blk_attempt_remerge(request_queue_t
EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_attempt_remerge);
+static void init_request_from_bio(struct request *req, struct bio *bio)
+{
+ req->flags |= REQ_CMD;
+
+ /*
+ * inherit FAILFAST from bio (for read-ahead, and explicit FAILFAST)
+ */
+ if (bio_rw_ahead(bio) || bio_failfast(bio))
+ req->flags |= REQ_FAILFAST;
+
+ /*
+ * REQ_BARRIER implies no merging, but lets make it explicit
+ */
+ if (unlikely(bio_barrier(bio)))
+ req->flags |= (REQ_HARDBARRIER | REQ_NOMERGE);
+
+ req->errors = 0;
+ req->hard_sector = req->sector = bio->bi_sector;
+ req->hard_nr_sectors = req->nr_sectors = bio_sectors(bio);
+ req->current_nr_sectors = req->hard_cur_sectors = bio_cur_sectors(bio);
+ req->nr_phys_segments = bio_phys_segments(req->q, bio);
+ req->nr_hw_segments = bio_hw_segments(req->q, bio);
+ req->buffer = bio_data(bio); /* see ->buffer comment above */
+ req->waiting = NULL;
+ req->bio = req->biotail = bio;
+ req->ioprio = bio_prio(bio);
+ req->rq_disk = bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk;
+ req->start_time = jiffies;
+}
+
static int __make_request(request_queue_t *q, struct bio *bio)
{
struct request *req;
@@ -2734,33 +2764,7 @@ get_rq:
* We don't worry about that case for efficiency. It won't happen
* often, and the elevators are able to handle it.
*/
-
- req->flags |= REQ_CMD;
-
- /*
- * inherit FAILFAST from bio (for read-ahead, and explicit FAILFAST)
- */
- if (bio_rw_ahead(bio) || bio_failfast(bio))
- req->flags |= REQ_FAILFAST;
-
- /*
- * REQ_BARRIER implies no merging, but lets make it explicit
- */
- if (unlikely(barrier))
- req->flags |= (REQ_HARDBARRIER | REQ_NOMERGE);
-
- req->errors = 0;
- req->hard_sector = req->sector = sector;
- req->hard_nr_sectors = req->nr_sectors = nr_sectors;
- req->current_nr_sectors = req->hard_cur_sectors = cur_nr_sectors;
- req->nr_phys_segments = bio_phys_segments(q, bio);
- req->nr_hw_segments = bio_hw_segments(q, bio);
- req->buffer = bio_data(bio); /* see ->buffer comment above */
- req->waiting = NULL;
- req->bio = req->biotail = bio;
- req->ioprio = prio;
- req->rq_disk = bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk;
- req->start_time = jiffies;
+ init_request_from_bio(req, bio);
spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
if (elv_queue_empty(q))
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-17 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-17 15:36 [PATCH linux-2.6-block:post-2.6.15 00/10] blk: reimplementation of I/O barrier Tejun Heo
2005-11-17 15:36 ` [PATCH linux-2.6-block:post-2.6.15 01/10] blk: add @uptodate to end_that_request_last() and @error to rq_end_io_fn() Tejun Heo
2005-11-17 15:36 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2005-11-17 15:36 ` [PATCH linux-2.6-block:post-2.6.15 03/10] blk: reimplement handling of barrier request Tejun Heo
2005-11-17 15:36 ` [PATCH linux-2.6-block:post-2.6.15 04/10] blk: update SCSI to use new blk_ordered Tejun Heo
2005-11-17 15:36 ` [PATCH linux-2.6-block:post-2.6.15 05/10] blk: add FUA support to SCSI disk Tejun Heo
2005-11-17 15:36 ` [PATCH linux-2.6-block:post-2.6.15 06/10] blk: update libata to use new blk_ordered Tejun Heo
2005-11-17 15:36 ` [PATCH linux-2.6-block:post-2.6.15 07/10] blk: add FUA support to libata Tejun Heo
2005-11-17 15:36 ` [PATCH linux-2.6-block:post-2.6.15 08/10] blk: update IDE to use new blk_ordered Tejun Heo
2005-11-17 20:11 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-11-18 15:07 ` Tejun Heo
2005-11-18 15:59 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-11-22 2:44 ` Tejun Heo
2005-11-22 8:36 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-11-22 8:39 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-11-23 7:23 ` Tejun Heo
2005-11-23 8:40 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-11-23 8:46 ` Jens Axboe
2005-11-23 9:00 ` Tejun
2005-11-23 9:05 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-11-17 15:36 ` [PATCH linux-2.6-block:post-2.6.15 09/10] blk: add FUA support to IDE Tejun Heo
2005-11-17 20:39 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-11-18 15:25 ` Tejun Heo
2005-11-18 16:17 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-11-18 17:02 ` Alan Cox
2005-11-18 16:38 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-11-18 17:41 ` Alan Cox
2005-11-24 11:58 ` Tejun Heo
2005-11-24 12:21 ` Tejun Heo
2005-11-24 14:21 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-11-17 15:37 ` [PATCH linux-2.6-block:post-2.6.15 10/10] blk: I/O barrier documentation Tejun Heo
2005-11-17 16:20 ` [PATCH linux-2.6-block:post-2.6.15 00/10] blk: reimplementation of I/O barrier Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051117153509.09EEAC11@htj.dyndns.org \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®