mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: axboe@suse.de, jgarzik@pobox.com, James.Bottomley@steeleye.com,
	bzolnier@gmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-2.6-block:post-2.6.15 02/10] blk: separate out bio init part from __make_request
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 00:36:21 +0900 (KST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051117153509.09EEAC11@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051117153509.B89B4777@htj.dyndns.org>

02_blk_implement-init_request_from_bio.patch

	Separate out bio initialization part from __make_request.  It
        will be used by the following blk_ordered_reimpl.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>

 ll_rw_blk.c |   62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

Index: work/block/ll_rw_blk.c
===================================================================
--- work.orig/block/ll_rw_blk.c	2005-11-18 00:35:04.000000000 +0900
+++ work/block/ll_rw_blk.c	2005-11-18 00:35:05.000000000 +0900
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@
 static void blk_unplug_work(void *data);
 static void blk_unplug_timeout(unsigned long data);
 static void drive_stat_acct(struct request *rq, int nr_sectors, int new_io);
+static void init_request_from_bio(struct request *req, struct bio *bio);
+static int __make_request(request_queue_t *q, struct bio *bio);
 
 /*
  * For the allocated request tables
@@ -1651,8 +1653,6 @@ static int blk_init_free_list(request_qu
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int __make_request(request_queue_t *, struct bio *);
-
 request_queue_t *blk_alloc_queue(gfp_t gfp_mask)
 {
 	return blk_alloc_queue_node(gfp_mask, -1);
@@ -2639,6 +2639,36 @@ void blk_attempt_remerge(request_queue_t
 
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_attempt_remerge);
 
+static void init_request_from_bio(struct request *req, struct bio *bio)
+{
+	req->flags |= REQ_CMD;
+
+	/*
+	 * inherit FAILFAST from bio (for read-ahead, and explicit FAILFAST)
+	 */
+	if (bio_rw_ahead(bio) || bio_failfast(bio))
+		req->flags |= REQ_FAILFAST;
+
+	/*
+	 * REQ_BARRIER implies no merging, but lets make it explicit
+	 */
+	if (unlikely(bio_barrier(bio)))
+		req->flags |= (REQ_HARDBARRIER | REQ_NOMERGE);
+
+	req->errors = 0;
+	req->hard_sector = req->sector = bio->bi_sector;
+	req->hard_nr_sectors = req->nr_sectors = bio_sectors(bio);
+	req->current_nr_sectors = req->hard_cur_sectors = bio_cur_sectors(bio);
+	req->nr_phys_segments = bio_phys_segments(req->q, bio);
+	req->nr_hw_segments = bio_hw_segments(req->q, bio);
+	req->buffer = bio_data(bio);	/* see ->buffer comment above */
+	req->waiting = NULL;
+	req->bio = req->biotail = bio;
+	req->ioprio = bio_prio(bio);
+	req->rq_disk = bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk;
+	req->start_time = jiffies;
+}
+
 static int __make_request(request_queue_t *q, struct bio *bio)
 {
 	struct request *req;
@@ -2734,33 +2764,7 @@ get_rq:
 	 * We don't worry about that case for efficiency. It won't happen
 	 * often, and the elevators are able to handle it.
 	 */
-
-	req->flags |= REQ_CMD;
-
-	/*
-	 * inherit FAILFAST from bio (for read-ahead, and explicit FAILFAST)
-	 */
-	if (bio_rw_ahead(bio) || bio_failfast(bio))
-		req->flags |= REQ_FAILFAST;
-
-	/*
-	 * REQ_BARRIER implies no merging, but lets make it explicit
-	 */
-	if (unlikely(barrier))
-		req->flags |= (REQ_HARDBARRIER | REQ_NOMERGE);
-
-	req->errors = 0;
-	req->hard_sector = req->sector = sector;
-	req->hard_nr_sectors = req->nr_sectors = nr_sectors;
-	req->current_nr_sectors = req->hard_cur_sectors = cur_nr_sectors;
-	req->nr_phys_segments = bio_phys_segments(q, bio);
-	req->nr_hw_segments = bio_hw_segments(q, bio);
-	req->buffer = bio_data(bio);	/* see ->buffer comment above */
-	req->waiting = NULL;
-	req->bio = req->biotail = bio;
-	req->ioprio = prio;
-	req->rq_disk = bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk;
-	req->start_time = jiffies;
+	init_request_from_bio(req, bio);
 
 	spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
 	if (elv_queue_empty(q))


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-11-17 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-17 15:36 [PATCH linux-2.6-block:post-2.6.15 00/10] blk: reimplementation of I/O barrier Tejun Heo
2005-11-17 15:36 ` [PATCH linux-2.6-block:post-2.6.15 01/10] blk: add @uptodate to end_that_request_last() and @error to rq_end_io_fn() Tejun Heo
2005-11-17 15:36 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2005-11-17 15:36 ` [PATCH linux-2.6-block:post-2.6.15 03/10] blk: reimplement handling of barrier request Tejun Heo
2005-11-17 15:36 ` [PATCH linux-2.6-block:post-2.6.15 04/10] blk: update SCSI to use new blk_ordered Tejun Heo
2005-11-17 15:36 ` [PATCH linux-2.6-block:post-2.6.15 05/10] blk: add FUA support to SCSI disk Tejun Heo
2005-11-17 15:36 ` [PATCH linux-2.6-block:post-2.6.15 06/10] blk: update libata to use new blk_ordered Tejun Heo
2005-11-17 15:36 ` [PATCH linux-2.6-block:post-2.6.15 07/10] blk: add FUA support to libata Tejun Heo
2005-11-17 15:36 ` [PATCH linux-2.6-block:post-2.6.15 08/10] blk: update IDE to use new blk_ordered Tejun Heo
2005-11-17 20:11   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-11-18 15:07     ` Tejun Heo
2005-11-18 15:59       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-11-22  2:44         ` Tejun Heo
2005-11-22  8:36           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-11-22  8:39             ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-11-23  7:23             ` Tejun Heo
2005-11-23  8:40               ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-11-23  8:46                 ` Jens Axboe
2005-11-23  9:00                   ` Tejun
2005-11-23  9:05                     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-11-17 15:36 ` [PATCH linux-2.6-block:post-2.6.15 09/10] blk: add FUA support to IDE Tejun Heo
2005-11-17 20:39   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-11-18 15:25     ` Tejun Heo
2005-11-18 16:17       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-11-18 17:02         ` Alan Cox
2005-11-18 16:38           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-11-18 17:41             ` Alan Cox
2005-11-24 11:58         ` Tejun Heo
2005-11-24 12:21           ` Tejun Heo
2005-11-24 14:21             ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-11-17 15:37 ` [PATCH linux-2.6-block:post-2.6.15 10/10] blk: I/O barrier documentation Tejun Heo
2005-11-17 16:20 ` [PATCH linux-2.6-block:post-2.6.15 00/10] blk: reimplementation of I/O barrier Jeff Garzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051117153509.09EEAC11@htj.dyndns.org \
    --to=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®